首页> 外文期刊>Thorax: The Journal of the British Thoracic Society >Clinical picture of community-acquired Chlamydia pneumoniae pneumonia requiring hospital treatment: a comparison between chlamydial and pneumococcal pneumonia.
【24h】

Clinical picture of community-acquired Chlamydia pneumoniae pneumonia requiring hospital treatment: a comparison between chlamydial and pneumococcal pneumonia.

机译:需要医院治疗的社区获得性肺炎衣原体肺炎的临床图片:衣原体和肺炎球菌性肺炎的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The importance of Chlamydia pneumoniae as a cause of pneumonia has remained controversial. The clinical picture of C pneumoniae and Streptococcus pneumoniae in patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia was compared during a C pneumoniae epidemic in Finland. METHODS: Group I consisted of 24 patients in whom serological testing and bacterial culture indicated an association with C pneumoniae only, group II comprised nine patients with both C pneumoniae and S pneumoniae, and group III consisted of 13 patients with S pneumoniae only. RESULTS: The patients with C pneumoniae suffered from headache more frequently than the other patients (group I, 46%; group II, 11%; and group III, 15%) and had received antimicrobial treatment more often before admission to hospital (group I, 54%; groups II and III, 0%). The patients with C pneumoniae produced few good sputum samples and had suffered from respiratory symptoms longer than those with S pneumoniae (group I, 10 days; groups II and III, 4 days). C reactive protein values on admission were lowest in group I and highest in group II. The antimicrobial treatment provided in hospital covered C pneumoniae in 36% of cases in group I and 0% in group II, while S pneumoniae was covered in all patients. C pneumoniae and S pneumoniae together were associated with more severe disease and a longer stay in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumonia caused by C pneumoniae was milder but clinically resembled that caused by S pneumoniae, and required hospital treatment even among young patients. Mixed infections were common and should be taken into account when planning antimicrobial treatment for community-acquired pneumonia. Further studies with more patients are needed to evaluate the severity of C pneumoniae pneumonia.
机译:背景:肺炎衣原体作为肺炎原因的重要性仍存在争议。在芬兰进行的一次C肺炎流行期间,对住院的社区获得性肺炎患者中C肺炎和肺炎链球菌的临床表现进行了比较。方法:第一组包括24例血清学检查和细菌培养表明仅与肺炎链球菌相关的患者,第二组包括9例肺炎链球菌和肺炎链球菌,第三组仅包括13例肺炎链球菌。结果:肺炎C型患者头痛的发生率比其他患者高(I组为46%; II组为11%; III组为15%),入院前接受抗菌药物治疗的频率更高(I组,占54%;第二和第三组,占0%)。与肺炎链球菌相比,肺炎链球菌患者的痰液样本少,呼吸系统症状的发作时间更长(I组为10天; II组和III组为4天)。入院时C反应蛋白值在I组最低,在II组最高。医院提供的抗菌药物治疗覆盖了I组36%的病例和II组0%的肺炎衣原体,所有患者均覆盖了S肺炎。肺炎链球菌和肺炎链球菌一起与更严重的疾病和更长的住院时间有关。结论:肺炎链球菌引起的肺炎较轻,但临床上类似于肺炎链球菌引起的肺炎,即使在年轻患者中也需要住院治疗。混合感染很常见,在规划社区获得性肺炎的抗菌治疗时应考虑到混合感染。需要对更多患者进行进一步研究,以评估肺炎衣原体肺炎的严重程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号