首页> 外文期刊>The Philippine Journal of Crop Science >HOW SUGARCANE PLANTERS EVALUATE AND DECIDE ON VARIETY
【24h】

HOW SUGARCANE PLANTERS EVALUATE AND DECIDE ON VARIETY

机译:甘蔗种植者如何评价和决定品种

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study was conducted in the mill district of Central Azucarrera de Don Pedro (CADP), Nasugbu, Batangas, from May to Augnst of 2003 to determine haw the planters evaluate and decide on what sugarcane variety to grow. Planters ' decision on varietywas found to be mainly influenced by what their fellow planters were currently raising. Phil 7544, given the local name Pampanga was observed to be the dominant variety used in the province. It had performed well under Batangas conditions and covered nearly 70% of sugarcane fields in the area during the study period. Interestingly, Phil 744 had been CADP planters favored varieties that were in popular use. Newly released and recommended hybrids take longer to be accepted since the CADP planters themselves who can afford test these new varieties before replacing their dominant variety. This raises two points: (a) that in the search for new improved crops, breeding and selection must always go together, and (b) that sugarcane scientists can best do the breeding while sugarcane planters can best do the selection. We recommend that the findings be taken positively by sugarcane breeding institutions because any adaptability data recorded in an earlier ecological test with new and recommended varieties needstill to be validated in planters fields in terms of yield stability across years of planting, particularly the ratoon performance of the variety. Planters weigh the risk of planting a variety they have not tested themselves as well as the cost of establishing a new crop, since under Batangas conditions this could reach P 20.500/ha. CADP planters gave a much lower rating to variety (15%) than to fertilizer (58%) and cultivation (19%) as a factor contributing to yield. Fertilizer was given the highest rating because without it, yields would be very low considering the low nutrient-supplying capacity of their soils that have been grown to sugarcane over long periods of time. Variety was given lower ratings. This is attributable to the way varieties arebeing used. Farm operations do not stop even if a variety is lost as they can request cuttings from their fellow planters or their Mill District Development Coordinator.
机译:这项研究于2003年5月至8月在八打雁纳苏格布的中央阿祖卡雷拉·德·唐·佩德罗(CADP)磨坊区进行,以确定种植者如何评估并决定种植哪种甘蔗品种。发现种植者对品种的决定主要受其种植者当前所种植的作物的影响。菲尔7544,当地名称邦板牙被认为是该省使用的主要品种。在研究期间,它在八打雁条件下表现良好,覆盖了该地区近70%的甘蔗田。有趣的是,Phil 744一直是CADP种植者青睐的流行品种。由于CADP种植者自己有能力在替代其主导品种之前对这些新品种进行测试,因此新发布和推荐的杂交品种需要更长的时间才能被接受。这提出了两点:(a)在寻找新的改良作物时,育种和选择必须始终在一起,(b)甘蔗科学家最好地进行育种,而甘蔗种植者可以最好地进行选择。我们建议甘蔗育种机构对这一发现持积极态度,因为在早期的生态试验中记录的任何新品种和推荐品种的适应性数据仍需在播种机田间进行多年种植的产量稳定性验证,尤其是该品种的再生表现。品种。种植者权衡种植自己尚未测试的品种的风险以及建立新作物的成本,因为在八打雁条件下,这可能达到P 20.500 / ha。 CADP种植者对品种(15%)的评价远低于对肥料(58%)和耕种(19%)的评价,这是提高产量的一个因素。肥料的评级最高,因为如果没有肥料,考虑到长期种植甘蔗的土壤的养分供应能力低,其产量将非常低。品种的评分较低。这归因于品种的使用方式。即使失去了品种,农场经营也不会停止,因为他们可以要求种植者或他们的磨坊地区发展协调员砍伐。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号