首页> 外文期刊>The Veterinary Journal >Fluctuating asymmetry and animal welfare: How far are we? And how far should we go?
【24h】

Fluctuating asymmetry and animal welfare: How far are we? And how far should we go?

机译:不断变化的不对称和动物福利:我们走了多远?我们应该走多远?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the associated review, published in this issue of the Journal, Moller and Manning (2003) propose measures of developmental instability, primarily fluctuating asymmetry, for the assessment of animal welfare in agricultural practice. They see the advantages of fluctuating asymmetry in that it provides a single measure of organismal health that "can be used in all kinds of organisms including viruses, plants and animals" and comes with perfect symmetry as a built-in optimum.
机译:在本期《期刊》上发表的相关综述中,Moller和Manning(2003)提出了发展不稳定的措施,主要是波动性不对称性,用于评估农业实践中的动物福利。他们看到了波动性不对称的优点,因为它提供了一种有机体健康的度量标准,“可以用于包括病毒,植物和动物在内的各种生物体”,并且具有完美的对称性作为内置的最佳选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号