首页> 外文期刊>The Veterinary Journal >Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): A validation study
【24h】

Monitoring acute equine visceral pain with the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP): A validation study

机译:用马乌特勒支大学疼痛综合评估量表(EQUUS-COMPASS)和马乌特勒支大学疼痛面部评估量表(EQUUS-FAP)监测急性马内脏疼痛:一项验证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study presents the validation of two recently described pain scales, the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS-COMPASS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Facial Assessment of Pain (EQUUS-FAP), in horses with acute colic. A follow-up cohort study of 46 adult horses (n = 23 with acute colic; n = 23 healthy control horses) was performed for validation and refinement of the constructed scales. Both pain scales showed statistically significant differences between horses with colic and healthy control horses, and between horses with colic that could be treated conservatively and those that required surgical treatment or were euthanased. Sensitivity and specificity were good for both EQUUS-COMPASS (87% and 71%, respectively) and EQUUS-FAP (77% and 100%, respectively) and were not substantially influenced by applying weighting factors to the individual parameters. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:这项研究提出了两个最近描述的疼痛程度的验证,即马匹乌特勒支大学综合疼痛评估量表(EQUUS-COMPASS)和马匹乌特勒支大学疼痛面部评估量表(EQUUS-FAP)在患有急性绞痛的马匹中。对46匹成年马(n = 23,急性绞痛; n = 23健康对照马)进行了一项队列研究,以验证和完善所构建的量表。两种疼痛量表在具有肠绞痛的马和健康对照组的马之间,以及可以通过保守治疗的绞痛的马与需要手术治疗或安乐死的马之间,在统计学上均具有显着差异。对EQUUS-COMPASS(分别为87%和71%)和EQUUS-FAP(分别为77%和100%)的敏感性和特异性都很好,并且不受加权参数对各个参数的实质影响。 (C)2016由Elsevier Ltd.出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号