...
首页> 外文期刊>The patient >Patient perceptions of generic medicines: A mixed-methods study
【24h】

Patient perceptions of generic medicines: A mixed-methods study

机译:病人对仿制药的看法:混合方法研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction: In an attempt to benefit from the cost-savings associated with use of generic medicines, in June 2013 Ireland introduced generic substitution and reference pricing for the first time. However, perceptions of Irish patients towards generic medicines have not been published previously. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess how generic medicines were perceived amongst patients in the time leading up to the enactment of the new legislation. Methodology: A total of 42 patients were recruited from general practices affiliated with the Graduate Entry Medical School at the University of Limerick and from community pharmacies. Interviews were semi-structured and included quantitative assessments of opinions using 15 structured questions and a five-point Likert scale response system. Interview transcripts were coded and thematically analysed using NVivo (version 9), for qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS (version 20). Results: Nearly one-third (31%) of patients had no knowledge of generic medicines and 39% of those exhibited confusion between the words 'generic' and 'genetic'. Almost one-quarter (24%) held the view that generics were of poorer quality than originators, while 18% expressed the opinion that generics do not work as well as originator products. Approximately one-third (30%) of patients believed that generics were manufactured to a poorer quality, with 29% holding the view that generics are less expensive due to being of inferior quality. Nearly 90% of patients stated they would take a generic medicine if it were prescribed by their GP; however, 24% of patients stated a preference, if offered a choice, for the originator medication. Additionally, a majority of patients (86%) were in favour of reference pricing and generic substitution. Of the patients interviewed, 50% stated that a leaflet, or similar, with appropriate, understandable, and accessible information regarding generic medicines would be of use to them. Conclusion: This is the first study of patients' attitudes towards generic medicines in Ireland. Conducted in the time period leading up to the implementation of legislation promoting the use of generic medicines, it highlights variable knowledge about generic medicines among this key stakeholder group. Although patients are supportive of their more widespread use, concerns regarding safety, clinical effectiveness, and manufacturing quality of generic medicines were identified.
机译:简介:为了从与使用仿制药有关的成本节省中受益,爱尔兰于2013年6月首次引入仿制药替代和参考定价。但是,爱尔兰患者对仿制药的看法以前尚未发表。因此,本研究的目的是评估在新法规颁布之前的这段时间内,患者对仿制药的看法。方法:从利默里克大学研究生入学医学院附属的普通科和社区药房招募了42位患者。访谈是半结构化的,包括使用15个结构化问题和五点李克特量表回答系统对意见进行的定量评估。使用NVivo(第9版)对访谈记录进行编码和主题分析,以获取定性数据。使用SPSS(版本20)分析定量数据。结果:将近三分之一(31%)的患者不了解非专利药,其中39%的患者在“非专利”和“非专利”两个词之间出现混淆。几乎四分之一(24%)的人认为,仿制药的质量比原研药差,而18%的人则认为,仿制药的功效不如原研药。大约三分之一(30%)的患者认为仿制药的质量较差,而29%的患者则认为仿制药由于质量较差而价格便宜。近90%的患者表示,如果他们的全科医生开了处方药,他们将服用仿制药;但是,有24%的患者表示愿意(如果可以选择)使用原始药物。此外,大多数患者(86%)赞成参考价和仿制药替代。在接受采访的患者中,有50%的人说,将使用有关适当的,易于理解和可获取的有关仿制药的信息的传单或类似内容。结论:这是爱尔兰对患者对非专利药态度的首次研究。它在实施促进使用仿制药的立法的时期内进行,强调了这一主要利益相关者群体对仿制药的不同认识。尽管患者支持其更广泛的使用,但人们仍对仿制药的安全性,临床有效性和制造质量表示担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号