首页> 外文期刊>The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society >Unstaged versus staged posterior-only thoracolumbar fusions in deformity: A retrospective comparison of perioperative complications
【24h】

Unstaged versus staged posterior-only thoracolumbar fusions in deformity: A retrospective comparison of perioperative complications

机译:非分期与分期仅后胸腰椎融合术治疗畸形:围手术期并发症的回顾性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background context Improvements in surgical techniques and medical support have made reconstruction of adult scoliosis more feasible. In an attempt to reduce the risk of complications, some surgeons have chosen to stage these procedures. Purpose We sought to compare a staged group versus an unstaged group of patients undergoing posterior-only instrumentation and fusion from the thoracic spine to the pelvis by a single surgeon for degenerative kyphoscoliosis or residual, progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis to assess for a difference in complications. Study design/setting Retrospective chart review. Patient sample We included 143 consecutive patients treated between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010. Outcome measure The primary outcome assessed was perioperative complications. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative transfusions, ICU stay, and disposition. Methods After institutional review board approval, records were analyzed to identify comorbidities and determine whether the management of each patient was planned in an unstaged or staged fashion. "Failures" were identified in which the plan was for an unstaged procedure but were converted to a staged procedure. Complications were defined as unplanned additional procedures or unexpected medical outcomes within 90 days of surgery. We considered p<.005 to be significant. Results Fifty-two patients underwent planned staged surgery and 90 underwent planned unstaged surgical procedures. Baseline demographics including American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index, and preoperative diabetic and cardiac status were not different between the two groups. Age was greater in the staged group (68 vs. 63 y; p=.001). Intraoperative transfusion and invasiveness index as defined by Mirza, were also higher in the staged group (p<.005). No difference was identified between the two intent-to-treat groups for complications including infection rate, death, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, other pulmonary complication, or blindness. Eleven of the 90 unstaged patients were unable to have their surgical procedure completed at the time of the index procedure. The 11 "failures" demonstrated a higher ASA compared with the 79 successfully treated unstaged procedures (p<.005), although no differences in complications. Conclusions There were no differences in complications between the intent-to-treat groups of staged and unstaged procedures, nor was there a difference comparing the "failures" of unstaged care to successful unstaged patients. Although fraught with potential complications, both techniques may be reasonable approaches.
机译:背景技术外科技术和医疗支持的改进使成人脊柱侧弯的重建更加可行。为了减少并发症的风险,一些外科医生选择进行这些手术。目的我们试图比较分期手术组和非分期手术组的患者,这些患者仅由一名外科医生进行变性后凸性脊柱侧凸或残余,进行性青春期特发性脊柱侧弯的后入路手术,并从胸椎到骨盆融合,以评估并发症的差异。研究设计/设置回顾性图表审查。患者样本我们纳入了143位在2000年1月1日至2010年12月31日期间接受治疗的患者。结果测量评估的主要结果是围手术期并发症。次要结果包括术中失血,术中输血,ICU停留和处置。方法经机构审查委员会批准后,对记录进行分析以鉴定合并症,并确定是否以非分阶段或分阶段的方式计划每个患者的治疗。确定了“失败”,其中计划针对的是未分阶段的程序,但已转换为分阶段的程序。并发症的定义是在手术90天内计划外的附加程序或意外的医疗结果。我们认为p <.005有意义。结果52例患者接受了计划的分期手术,其中90例接受了计划的非分期手术程序。两组的基线人口统计资料(包括美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)评分,体重指数以及术前糖尿病和心脏状况)没有差异。分期组的年龄更大(68岁vs. 63岁; p = .001)。分期组术中输注和侵袭性指数由Mirza定义也较高(p <.005)。两组意向性治疗的并发症,包括感染率,死亡,心肌梗塞,中风,肺栓塞,其他肺部并发症或失明,没有发现差异。 90名未分阶段的患者中有11名在分度手术时无法完成手术。与79例成功治疗的未分期手术相比,11例“失败”显示出更高的ASA(p <.005),尽管并发症无差异。结论分阶段和非分期手术的意向治疗组之间的并发症没有差异,将未分阶段护理的“失败”与成功的未分阶段患者进行比较也没有差异。尽管充满潜在的并发症,但这两种技术可能都是合理的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号