...
【24h】

Biomechanical Evaluation of Custom Foot Orthoses for Hallux Valgus Deformity

机译:自定义足矫形器对拇趾外翻畸形的生物力学评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of the present study was to compare the hallux valgus deformity pressure parameters seen in standard footwear (no orthosis) versus the pressure observed in the same footwear with the addition of 3 different length orthoses. The forefoot pressure at a hallux valgus deformity was recorded with pressure sensors placed on the plantar, medial, and dorsal surface of the first metatarsal head. The participants performed walking trials without an orthosis and with orthoses of 3 different lengths. The average pressure and maximum pressure of each area was recorded for each orthosis, and comparisons were made across the groups. The plantar pressures were decreased in the full length and 3/4 length orthoses, and the dorsal pressures were increased with the use of the full-length and sulcus-length orthoses. Significant changes in medial pressure were not seen with the addition of any orthosis compared with standard footwear alone. However, a trend toward increased medial pressures was seen with the full- and sulcus-length orthoses, and the 3/4-length orthoses exhibited a trend toward decreased medial pressures. We were unable to demonstrate that the use of a custom foot orthosis significantly decreases the medial pressures on the first metatarsal head in patients with hallux valgus deformity. The 3/4-length orthosis was less likely to negatively affect the dorsal or medial pressures, which were noted to increase with the sulcus- and full-length orthoses. Our data suggest that if a clinician uses this treatment option, a 3/4-length orthosis might be a better choice than a sulcus- or full-length orthosis. (C) 2015 by the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. All rights reserved.
机译:本研究的目的是比较在标准鞋类(无矫形器)中观察到的拇外翻畸形压力参数与在添加了3种不同长度的矫形器的情况下在同一鞋类中观察到的压力。用放置在第一meta骨头的足底,内侧和背面的压力传感器记录拇指外翻畸形的前脚压力。参与者进行了没有矫形器和3种不同长度的矫形器的步行试验。记录每个矫形器每个区域的平均压力和最大压力,并在各组之间进行比较。在全长和3/4长度的矫形器中,足底压力降低,而在全长和沟长的矫形器中使用时,背压增加。与单独的标准鞋相比,添加任何矫形器均未观察到内侧压力的显着变化。但是,在全长和沟长矫形器中都观察到了内侧压力升高的趋势,而3/4长度的矫形器则显示了内侧压力降低的趋势。我们无法证明习惯性足部矫形器的使用可显着降低患有拇外翻畸形的患者的第一the骨头的内侧压力。 3/4长度的矫形器不太可能对背侧或内侧压力产生负面影响,而背压或内侧压力随着牙槽和全长矫形器的增加而增加。我们的数据表明,如果临床医生使用此治疗方案,则比全长或全长的矫形器更好的选择是3/4长度的矫形器。 (C)2015年,美国脚踝外科学院。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号