首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly journal of experimental psychology: QJEP >A comparison of backward and forward spatial spans
【24h】

A comparison of backward and forward spatial spans

机译:前后空间跨度比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The standard Corsi blocks task is frequently used to measure the capacity of visuospatial working memory, but the implications of the use of both forward and backward recall are still unclear. In the present study, we showed that the backward Corsi task is particularly powerful in discriminating between low- and high-spatial-ability individuals and involves different processes from those involved in the forward task. From a sample of 425 participants we selected one group of 20 high-spatial-ability participants and one of 20 low-spatial-ability participants. The results demonstrated that a backward spatial span offers specific information not available from a forward spatial span, and that there was no facilitation due to a descending format. In particular, in the low-spatial-ability group, performance was generally poorer, but backward Corsi recall was lower than forward recall, and participants did not show any advantage following the descending presentation format-which in some contexts is considered to reduce proactive interference. We conclude that the backward Corsi task has specific value and that the assumption of fully parallel verbal and visuospatial working-memory systems can lead to a variety of misunderstandings.
机译:标准的“ Corsi阻止”任务经常用于衡量视觉空间工作记忆的容量,但同时使用向前和向后召回的含义仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们表明,向后Corsi任务在区分低空间能力和高空间能力的个体方面特别强大,并且涉及与向前任务有关的过程不同的过程。从425名参与者的样本中,我们选择了一组20名高空间能力参与者和20名低空间能力参与者之一。结果表明,后向空间跨度提供了从前向空间跨度无法获得的特定信息,并且由于降序格式而没有简化。尤其是在低空间容量组中,性能通常较差,但后向Corsi回忆比前向回忆要低,并且参与者按照递减的演示文稿格式并没有显示任何优势-在某些情况下,这被认为可以减少主动干扰。我们得出的结论是,向后的Corsi任务具有特定的价值,并且完全平行的言语和视觉空间工作记忆系统的假设可能导致各种误解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号