...
【24h】

The control of soft rush Juncus effusus by cutting

机译:割草控制草的急冲

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although a low cover of soft rush Juncus effusus L. in species-rich pastures is often desirable from a nature conservation viewpoint, where the plant is too abundant its control can be problematic. Cutting is the only acceptable treatment where both nature conservation and organic production are primary aims of management. This paper explores the most effective ways of controlling soft rush through cutting, summarising both previous research and presenting new data collected in Devon, England. Cutting reduces the vigour of soft rush tussocks and the effect is increased with multiple cuts. Cutting flush with the ground is more effective than cutting at a height of 8cm or higher. Tussocks can survive at least eleven consecutive cuts at 8cm. After six cuts at this height, whether at fortnightly or monthly intervals, any further reduction in tussock vigour is minimal. If only a single cut is possible, then cutting after midsummer is more effective than before midsummer, but the reverse may be true if several cuts are possible. Cutting at monthly intervals is more effective than at fortnightly intervals. It is concluded that cutting alone is unlikely to reduce the cover of soft rush unless several cuts in a year are possible. In view of this, management should aim to anticipate and prevent any rush build-up. Where wildlife constraints allow, cuts should be as close to the ground as possible, probably start before midsummer, and be at monthly (or possibly longer) intervals. Cut material should preferably be removed. It is suggested that it may be in the long-term interests of problem sites if in some years a rigorous cutting regime is followed.
机译:从自然保护的观点来看,尽管通常希望在物种丰富的牧场中使用低矮的急冲杜鹃(Juncus effusus L.),但由于植物过于丰富,其控制可能会出现问题。砍伐是自然保护和有机生产都是管理的主要目标的唯一可接受的处理方法。本文探讨了通过切割控制软冲的最有效方法,总结了以前的研究并提出了在英国德文郡收集的新数据。切割减少了软草丛的活力,多次切割增加了效果。与地面齐平切割比在8cm或更高的高度切割更有效。 s在8厘米处至少可以连续割十一次。在此高度下进行六次切割后,无论是每两周一次还是每月一次,在进一步降低肌活力方面,微乎其微。如果只能进行一次切割,则仲夏之后的切割比仲夏之前的切割更有效,但是如果可以进行多次切割,则相反。每月进行一次切割比每两周进行一次切割更有效。得出的结论是,除非每年可能进行多次切割,否则单独切割不太可能减少软草皮的覆盖率。有鉴于此,管理层应着眼于预期并防止任何紧急情况的累积。在野生动植物限制条件下,砍伐应尽可能靠近地面,可能在仲夏之前开始,并应每月(或更长)间隔进行。切割的材料最好应去除。有人建议,如果在几年内采用严格的切割制度,这可能是问题现场的长期利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号