首页> 外文期刊>The Knee >Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up
【24h】

Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up

机译:在早期随访中,计算机辅助导航优于传统器械在原发全膝关节置换术中的临床优势很小

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: Even though computer-assisted navigation systems have been shown to improve the accuracy of implantation of components into the femur and tibia, long-term results are lacking and there is little evidence yet that navigation techniques also improve functional outcomes and implant longevity following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to summarize and compare the clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed using navigation-assisted and conventional techniques. Methods: The study was conducted according to the guidelines described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statements. Methodological features were rated independently by two reviewers. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi- randomized controlled trials (qRCTs) was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of CAS versus conventional TKA. Data were pooled in fixed and random effects models and the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) were calculated. Heterogeneity across studies was determined, and subgroup analyses by the type of navigation system (image-based or image-free navigation system) were conducted. Results: Twenty-one studies that included 2333 knees were collected from different countries. The surgical time was longer for CN TKA than for the conventional procedure. There was no significant difference in the Knee Society Score between the two groups at the 3-month and 6-month follow-up. The rates of postoperative complications in patients who had CN TKA were similar to those in the patients who had conventional TKA. Conclusion: No significant differences in short-term clinical outcomes were found following TKAs performed with and without computer navigation system. However, there is clearly a need for additional high-quality clinical trials with long-term follow-up to confirm the clinical benefits of computer-assisted surgery.
机译:目的:尽管已显示出计算机辅助导航系统可以提高将组件植入股骨和胫骨的准确性,但缺乏长期的效果,而且几乎没有证据表明导航技术还可以改善整体手术后的功能结果和植入物的寿命膝关节置换术(TKA)。这项研究的目的是总结和比较使用导航辅助和常规技术进行的全膝关节置换术(TKA)的临床结果。方法:本研究是根据《 Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册》和《系统评价和荟萃分析陈述的首选报告项目》中所述的指南进行的。方法的功能由两名审阅者独立评估。对随机对照试验(RCT)或准随机对照试验(qRCTs)进行了荟萃分析,以评估CAS与常规TKA的疗效。在固定和随机效应模型中汇总数据,并计算加权平均差(WMD)和优势比(OR)。确定了研究之间的异质性,并根据导航系统类型(基于图像或无图像的导航系统)进行了亚组分析。结果:从不同国家收集了二十一项研究,包括2333个膝盖。 CN TKA的手术时间比传统手术更长。在三个月和六个月的随访中,两组之间的膝关节社会评分没有显着差异。 CN TKA患者的术后并发症发生率与传统TKA患者相似。结论:在有和没有计算机导航系统的情况下进行TKA后,短期临床结果均无显着差异。但是,显然需要进行长期随访的其他高质量临床试验,以确认计算机辅助手术的临床益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号