首页> 外文期刊>The lancet oncology >Irradiation stents: A clever, and maybe costly, fusion
【24h】

Irradiation stents: A clever, and maybe costly, fusion

机译:辐照支架:聪明的,也许是昂贵的融合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Oesophageal cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Most cases of oesophageal cancer (83%) and deaths due to this disease (86%) occur in low-income and middle-income countries. Despite many advances, cure remains unachievable for most patients with oesophageal cancer, and the primary treatment goals become palliative and supportive. The ideal palliative therapy would provide rapid and sustained relief of dysphagia (the primary symptom of advanced oesophageal cancer) with one intervention, result in few complications, be widely available at low cost, have minimum need for hospital admission or re-intervention, and extend survival. In The Lancet Oncology, Hai-Dong Zhu and colleagues2 present their second randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing placement of conventional endoluminal stents with novel stents that incorporate 125I seeds. These investigators are attempting to combine the advantages of stents and brachytherapy into a single-treatment modality. In their previous pilot study,3 the investigators reported a remarkable difference in mean survival (8.3 months for the 125I stents and 35 months for the conventional stents).
机译:食道癌是全球癌症死亡的主要原因。多数食道癌病例(83%)和因该疾病引起的死亡(86%)发生在低收入和中等收入国家。尽管取得了许多进展,但对于大多数食道癌患者仍然无法实现治愈,并且主要治疗目标已成为姑息治疗和支持治疗。理想的姑息治疗将通过一次干预提供吞咽困难(晚期食道癌的主要症状)的快速,持续缓解,并发症少,成本低廉,对住院或再次干预的需求最少,并且扩展生存。在《柳叶刀肿瘤》杂志上,朱海东及其同事2介绍了他们的第二项随机对照临床试验,该试验比较了传统腔内支架与装有125I种子的新型支架的位置。这些研究人员正在尝试将支架和近距离放射疗法的优势结合到单一治疗方式中。在他们先前的先期研究中3,研究人员报告了平均生存率的显着差异(125I支架为8.3个月,常规支架为35个月)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号