...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of rheumatology >The comprehensive osteoarthritis test: a simple index for measurement of treatment effects in clinical trials.
【24h】

The comprehensive osteoarthritis test: a simple index for measurement of treatment effects in clinical trials.

机译:全面的骨关节炎测试:在临床试验中衡量治疗效果的简单指标。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To assess the measurement properties of a simple index of symptom severity in osteoarthritis (OA) of the hips and knees. METHODS: Both the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the proposed new Comprehensive Osteoarthritis Test (COAT) instrument were completed weekly by 125 subjects in the context of a randomized, 12-week, 3 parallel-arm clinical trial. The reliabilities of the various scales were assessed on a weekly basis by use of Cronbach's alpha coefficients. The validity of the COAT total scale was assessed by correlation with the WOMAC total scale on a weekly basis with correlation coefficients, and in terms of the correlations between subject-level intercepts and slopes over time. The relative responsiveness of the WOMAC and COAT total scales was assessed using a multilevel (longitudinal) multivariate (WOMAC, COAT) linear model. RESULTS: The WOMAC and COAT total scales were highly reliable (mean over weeks: WOMAC alpha = 0.98; COAT alpha = 0.97). The correlations between the WOMAC and COAT scales were very high (mean over weeks = 0.92; subject-level intercepts = 0.91, slopes = 0.88). The COAT total scale was significantly more responsive than the WOMAC total scale in the active treatment (34.8% improvement vs 26.8%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The COAT total scale is simple to administer, reliable, valid, and responsive to treatment effects.
机译:目的:评估髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎(OA)中症状严重程度的简单指标的测量特性。方法:在随机,12周,3平行临床试验的背景下,每周有125位受试者每周完成西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学的骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和拟议的新型综合性骨关节炎测试(COAT)仪器。每周使用Cronbach'sα系数评估各种量表的可靠性。 COAT总体量表的有效性通过每周与WOMAC总体量表之间的相关性以及相关系数,以及受试者水平的截距和随时间变化的斜率之间的相关性进行评估。使用多级(纵向)多元(WOMAC,COAT)线性模型评估了WOMAC和COAT总评分的相对响应度。结果:WOMAC和COAT的总评分是高度可靠的(平均数周:WOMAC alpha = 0.98; COAT alpha = 0.97)。 WOMAC和COAT量表之间的相关性非常高(平均数周= 0.92;受试者水平截距= 0.91,斜率= 0.88)。在积极的治疗中,COAT总评分比WOMAC总评分反应更好(改善34.8%vs 26.8%; p = 0.002)。结论:COAT总评分标准易于管理,可靠,有效且对治疗效果敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号