【24h】

Why don't people buy long-term-care insurance?

机译:人们为什么不购买长期护理保险?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this article was to assess the determinants of an individual's decision to purchase long-term-care (LTC) insurance. This article focuses on the decision to purchase a new policy as opposed to renewing an existing policy. This study gave special consideration to the role of policy price, the savings associated with buying a policy now as opposed to later, the purchaser's education, and the purchaser's income. METHODS: Using data from the 2002 Health and Retirement Survey, we estimated logistic regressions to model consumer decisions to purchase LTC insurance. We explored several alternative measures of the price of a policy. RESULTS: Price was a significant determinant in decisions to purchase coverage. The demand for coverage, however, was price inelastic, with elasticities ranging from -0.23 to -0.87, depending on the specification of the model. The education level and income of the purchaser were also important. DISCUSSION: This analysis provides the first estimates of price elasticity of demand for LTC insurance. The finding that demand is very price inelastic suggests that state initiatives that effectively subsidize premiums as a way of stimulating purchases are likely to meet with very limited success in the present environment.
机译:目标:本文的目的是评估个人决定购买长期护理(LTC)保险的决定因素。本文重点介绍购买新保单的决定,而不是更新现有保单。这项研究特别考虑了保单价格的作用,与以后购买相对于以后购买保单相关的节省,购买者的学历以及购买者的收入。方法:使用2002年健康与退休调查中的数据,我们估计了逻辑回归模型,以建立消费者购买LTC保险的决策模型。我们探讨了保单价格的几种替代措施。结果:价格是决定购买保险的重要决定因素。但是,对覆盖范围的需求是价格无弹性的,其弹性范围为-0.23至-0.87,具体取决于模型的规格。购买者的教育水平和收入也很重要。讨论:该分析提供了LTC保险需求价格弹性的初步估计。需求非常缺乏价格弹性的发现表明,在当前环境下,有效补贴保费作为刺激购买方式的国家计划可能会获得非常有限的成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号