...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the American Dental Association >The efficacy of three desensitizing agents used to treat dentin hypersensitivity.
【24h】

The efficacy of three desensitizing agents used to treat dentin hypersensitivity.

机译:三种脱敏剂用于治疗牙本质过敏的功效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: In a single-center, double-masked, split-mouth-designed, clinical short-term trial, the authors assessed the clinical responses of teeth with dentin hypersensitivity (DH) after treating the teeth with one of three desensitizing agents across four weeks. METHODS: The authors selected 131 teeth with DH in 11 participants. The authors assessed DH of the teeth by using tactile stimuli and air stimuli and had the participants record the level of sensitivity by means of a visual analog scale (VAS). The authors then treated the teeth with one of three desensitizing agents (Pain-Free [Parkell, Edgewood, N.Y.], BisBlock [Bisco, Schaumburg, Ill.], Seal & Protect [Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany]) that they applied according to the manufacturers' instructions. The authors used a split-mouth-designed study in which the teeth in different quadrants of the participants' mouths received different desensitizing agents. The authors also conducted DH evaluations at 10 minutes after treatment and at one, two, three and four weeks. The authors analyzed data statistically by using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: The results of the statistical analysis showed that all VAS scores at the posttreatment evaluation periods were reduced significantly compared with those at baseline (P<.05). More teeth were sensitive to air stimuli than to tactile stimuli. The mean VAS scores for DH in the mandibular teeth were significantly higher than for those in maxillary teeth immediately after treatment (for tactile stimuli) and two weeks after the first application (for air stimuli) (P<.05) CONCLUSIONS: All three desensitizing agents were effective in relieving DH up to four weeks, independent of their application procedures. There was, however, a significant reduction in mean sensitivity scores of teeth that had been treated with Seal & Protect and Pain-Free compared with those of BisBlock at weeks two, three and four. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The study results should be considered with caution, as it is not clear how many of the pain relief effects were related to the natural desensitization of teeth over time.
机译:背景:在一项单中心,双掩蔽,裂口设计的临床短期试验中,作者在对三种脱敏剂中的一种进行治疗后,对其中的四种脱敏剂进行了评估,从而评估了牙本质过敏症(DH)对牙齿的临床反应。周。方法:作者在11名参与者中选择了131颗具有DH的牙齿。作者通过使用触觉刺激和空气刺激来评估牙齿的DH,并让参与者通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录敏感性水平。然后,作者根据他们使用的三种脱敏剂(无痛[Parkell,Edgewood,NY],BisBlock [Bisco,Schaumburg,Ill。],Seal&Protect [Dentsply DeTrey,Konstanz,Germany]中的一种来治疗牙齿。按照制造商的说明。作者使用了一项分口设计的研究,参与者的不同象限中的牙齿接受了不同的脱敏剂。作者还在治疗后10分钟以及一,二,三和四周进行了DH评估。作者使用Mann-Whitney U和Kruskal-Wallis检验对数据进行了统计分析。结果:统计分析结果表明,与基线时相比,治疗后评估期的所有VAS得分均显着降低(P <.05)。对空气刺激比对触觉刺激更敏感的牙齿。下颌牙齿中DH的平均VAS评分显着高于刚治疗后(对于触觉刺激)和首次应用后两周(对于空气刺激)的上颌牙齿(P <.05)结论:所有这三种脱敏药剂可有效缓解DH长达四个星期,而与他们的应用程序无关。但是,与BisBlock在第二,第三和第四周相比,用Seal&Protect和无痛治疗的牙齿的平均敏感度得分显着降低。临床意义:应谨慎考虑研究结果,因为尚不清楚随着时间的推移,有多少止痛效果与牙齿自然脱敏有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号