首页> 外文期刊>The new bioethics: A multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body >'To arrive where we started,and know the place for the first time':Heidegger, Phenomenology, the Way Human Beings First Appear in the World, and Fresh Perspectives on the Abortion Debate
【24h】

'To arrive where we started,and know the place for the first time':Heidegger, Phenomenology, the Way Human Beings First Appear in the World, and Fresh Perspectives on the Abortion Debate

机译:“到达我们的起点,并第一次了解这个地方”:海德格尔,现象学,人类在世界上的首次出现以及对堕胎辩论的新见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Intellectual stalemate in the abortion debate can be traced in part to its being framed as a standoff between religion and secular philosophy. While the former is thought to generate a broadly 'pro-life' position, the latter is associated with more 'pro-choice' thinking. This essay attempts to break free of this framing by criticising the philosophy informing 'pro-choice' positions, but not by resorting immediately to religious arguments but rather by drawing upon a rival philosophical tradition - the movement within twentieth and twenty-first Continental philosophy which was and is phenomenology. A phenomenological approach to human 'emergence', and in particular an application of the framework Heidegger developed in Being and Time (1927), leads to a radical questioning of whether contemporary English-speaking beginning-of-life ethics have adequately taken into account the way human beings come forth in the world.
机译:流产辩论中的思想僵局可以部分归因于它被构想为宗教与世俗哲学之间的对峙。尽管前者被认为具有广泛的“赞成生活”立场,但后者与更多的“赞成选择”思想联系在一起。本文试图通过批评告知“亲选择”立场的哲学,而不是立即诉诸宗教论点,而是借鉴一种敌对的哲学传统,即二十世纪和二十一世纪大陆哲学运动,打破这种框架。过去和现在都是现象学。对人类“出现”的一种现象学方法,特别是海德格尔在《存在与时间》(1927年)中开发的框架的应用,引发了一个根本问题,即当代讲英语的生命开始伦理学是否已充分考虑到人在世界上出现的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号