首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of toxicological sciences >Unsaturated fatty acids show clear elicitation responses in a modified local lymph node assay with an elicitation phase, and test positive in the direct peptide reactivity assay
【24h】

Unsaturated fatty acids show clear elicitation responses in a modified local lymph node assay with an elicitation phase, and test positive in the direct peptide reactivity assay

机译:不饱和脂肪酸在修饰的局部淋巴结试验中具有诱导阶段,显示清晰的诱导反应,在直接肽反应性试验中测试呈阳性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Test Guidelines (TG) adopted the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) as stand-alone skin sensitization test methods. However, unsaturated carbon-carbon double-bond and/or lipid acids afforded false-positive results more frequently in the LLNA compared to those in the GPMT and/or in human subjects. In the current study, oleic, linoleic, linolenic, undecylenic, fumaric, maleic, and succinic acid and squalene were tested in a modified LLNA with an elicitation phase (LLNA:DAE), and in a direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) to evaluate their skin-sensitizing potential. Oleic, linoleic, linolenic, undecylenic and maleic acid were positive in the LLNA:DAE, of which three, linoleic, linolenic, and maleic acid were positive in the DPRA. Furthermore, the results of the cross-sensitizing tests using four LLNA:DAE-positive chemicals were negative, indicating a chemical-specific elicitation response. In a previous report, the estimated concentration needed to produce a stimulation index of 3 (EC3) of linolenic acid, squalene, and maleic acid in the LLNA was < 10%. Therefore, these chemicals were classified as moderate skin sensitizers in the LLNA. However, the skin-sensitizing potential of all LLNA:DAE-positive chemicals was estimated as weak. These results suggested that oleic, linoleic, linolenic, undecylenic, and maleic acid had skin-sensitizing potential, and that the LLNA overestimated the skin-sensitizing potential compared to that estimated by the LLNA:DAE.
机译:经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的测试指南(TG)采用了鼠类局部淋巴结测定(LLNA)和豚鼠最大化测试(GPMT)作为独立的皮肤致敏性测试方法。但是,与GPMT和/或人类受试者相比,LLNA中不饱和碳-碳双键和/或脂质酸更容易产生假阳性结果。在当前的研究中,油酸,亚油酸,亚麻酸,十一碳烯酸,富马酸,马来酸,琥珀酸和角鲨烯均在改良的LLNA中进行诱导阶段(LLNA:DAE),并在直接肽反应性测定(DPRA)中进行测试他们的皮肤过敏潜力。 LLNA:DAE中的油酸,亚油酸,亚麻酸,十一碳烯酸和马来酸呈阳性,其中三个油酸,亚麻酸和马来酸在DPRA中呈阳性。此外,使用四种LLNA:DAE阳性化学物质的交叉敏化测试结果为阴性,表明化学特异性激发反应。在以前的报告中,LLNA中产生亚麻酸,角鲨烯和马来酸刺激指数3(EC3)所需的估计浓度为<10%。因此,这些化学物质在LLNA中被列为中度皮肤致敏剂。但是,所有LLNA:DAE阳性化学物质的皮肤致敏能力估计都很弱。这些结果表明,油酸,亚油酸,亚麻酸,十一碳烯酸和马来酸具有皮肤致敏性,与LLNA:DAE估计的结果相比,LLNA高估了皮肤致敏性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号