首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery >Effect of sensitization in US heart transplant recipients bridged with a ventricular assist device: update in a modern cohort.
【24h】

Effect of sensitization in US heart transplant recipients bridged with a ventricular assist device: update in a modern cohort.

机译:敏化作用在心室辅助装置桥接的美国心脏移植受者中的作用:现代人群中的最新情况。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies have been associated with prolonged wait times and increased mortality in orthotopic heart transplantation. We used United Network for Organ Sharing data to examine panel reactive antibody titers in patients bridged to transplant with left ventricular assist devices. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset for all patients bridged to orthotopic heart transplantation with a HeartMate II or HeartMate XVE (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, Calif) from January 2004 to December 2009. Patients were primarily stratified by device type and secondarily grouped for comparisons by high (>25%) versus low (0%) panel reactive antibody activity (class I and II). Outcomes included survival (30-day and 1-year), treated rejection in the year after orthotopic heart transplantation, and primary graft dysfunction. Cox proportional hazards regression examined 30-day and 1-year survival. RESULTS: A total of 871 patients (56.1%) received the HeartMate II device, and 673 patients (43.9%) received the HeartMate XVE device. Patients with high panel reactive antibody had longer duration on the wait list (205 days [interquartile range, 81-344] vs 124 days [interquartile range, 51-270], P = .01). High panel reactive antibody class II was more common in patients with the HeartMate XVE device (51/547 [9.3%] vs 42/777 [5.4%], P < .001). When the entire cohort was examined together, there was no 30-day or 1-year survival difference based on panel reactive antibody activity. Device type did not affect post-orthotopic heart transplantation survival, and panel reactive antibody activity was not associated with worse mortality in Cox regression. Although panel reactive antibody activity did not affect rejection in the year after orthotopic heart transplantation for either device type, high panel reactive antibody class II was associated with higher rates of primary graft dysfunction for both devices (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest modern study to examine the impact of detailed panel reactive antibody information in patients bridged to transplant. High panel reactive antibody levels do not affect drug-treated rejection episodes in the first year post-orthotopic heart transplantation; however, there is an associated higher rate of primary graft dysfunction, regardless of device type. Highly sensitized patients bridged to transplant experience excellent survival outcomes after orthotopic heart transplantation.
机译:目的:预制的抗人白细胞抗原抗体与原位心脏移植的等待时间延长和死亡率增加有关。我们使用器官共享的联合网络数据检查了通过左心室辅助设备桥接移植的患者的反应性抗体效价。方法:这是对2004年1月至2009年12月间使用HeartMate II或HeartMate XVE(Thoratec Corp,Pleasanton,CA)通过原位心脏移植桥接的所有患者的器官共享联合网络数据集的回顾性回顾。装置类型,然后按高(> 25%)与低(0%)面板反应性抗体活性(I和II类)进行分组比较。结果包括生存期(30天和1年),原位心脏移植后一年的治疗排斥反应和原发性移植物功能障碍。 Cox比例风险回归检查了30天和1年生存期。结果:共有871例患者(56.1%)接受了HeartMate II设备,673例患者(43.9%)接受了HeartMate XVE设备。具有高面板反应性抗体的患者在等待名单上的病程更长(205天[四分位间距81-344]比124天[四分位间距51-270],P = 0.01)。在使用HeartMate XVE装置的患者中,II级高面板反应性抗体更为常见(51/547 [9.3%]对42/777 [5.4%],P <.001)。当一起检查整个队列时,基于面板反应性抗体活性,没有30天或1年生存差异。设备类型不影响原位心脏移植后的生存,并且面板反应性抗体活性与Cox回归中的较差死亡率无关。尽管两种反应器类型的面板反应性抗体活性在原位心脏移植后的一年中均不会影响排斥反应,但两种反应器的高面板反应性II类抗体与较高的原发性移植物功能障碍发生率相关(P <.05)。结论:这是最大的现代研究,旨在检查详细的面板反应性抗体信息对桥接患者的影响。高原板反应性抗体水平不会影响原位心脏移植后第一年的药物治疗排斥反应;然而,无论装置类型如何,原发性移植物功能障碍的发生率均较高。移植到桥上的高度敏感的患者在原位心脏移植后获得了出色的生存结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号