...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness >Comparison of the take-off ground reaction force patterns of the pole vault and the long jump.
【24h】

Comparison of the take-off ground reaction force patterns of the pole vault and the long jump.

机译:撑杆跳和跳远起跳地面反作用力模式的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

AIM: The take-off is probably the most important phase of the pole vault. The kinematics of pole vault take-off is often described in comparison to the long jump take-off. If a kinetic similarity were also evidenced, the extra loading of carrying the pole could be avoided by using the long jump style take-off drills in pole vault take-off training. However, to our knowledge, a direct comparison of the take-off ground reaction force (GRF) pattern of the two types of jump has not been reported in the scientific or coaching literature. The purpose of this study was to compare the take-off GRF patterns of the support leg in the pole vault and the long jump. METHODS: Twelve elite women jumpers undertook pole vault and long jump trials. The take-off GRF patterns were recorded by a force plate (Kistler-9286AA). Temporal and force parameters were determined for all three GRF components. Trials were videotaped to determine the take-off kinematics. Paired sample t-tests (SPSS 13.0) were applied (P0.05). Overall, the GRF patterns were similar, although there were particular significant (P
机译:目的:起飞可能是撑杆跳的最重要阶段。与跳远起跳相比,经常描述撑杆跳起的运动学。如果还证明了动力学上的相似性,则可以通过在撑杆跳高训练中使用跳远式起飞训练器来避免携带杆子的额外负担。然而,据我们所知,科学或教练文献中尚未报道直接比较两种跳跃类型的起飞地面反作用力(GRF)模式。这项研究的目的是比较撑杆跳和跳远中支撑腿的起飞GRF模式。方法:十二名精英女子跳线运动员进行了撑竿跳高和跳远试验。起飞GRF图由测力板(Kistler-9286AA)记录。确定了所有三个GRF组件的时间和力参数。对试验进行录像以确定起飞运动学。采用配对样本t检验(SPSS 13.0)(P 0.05)。总体而言,GRF模式相似,尽管在接触时间,冲动和力峰值方面存在特别显着的(P

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号