...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of school health >Violence and drug use in rural teens: national prevalence estimates from the 2003 Youth Risk Behavior Survey.
【24h】

Violence and drug use in rural teens: national prevalence estimates from the 2003 Youth Risk Behavior Survey.

机译:农村青少年的暴力行为和毒品使用:2003年青少年风险行为调查的全国患病率估计。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare national estimates of drug use and exposure to violence between rural and urban teens. METHODS: Twenty-eight dependent variables from the 2003 Youth Risk Behavior Survey were used to compare violent activities, victimization, suicidal behavior, tobacco use, alcohol use, and illegal drug use across rural, urban, and suburban teens across the country. RESULTS: Overall, rural teens were equally or more likely than both suburban and urban teens to report experiencing many measures of violent behavior, victimization, suicide behaviors, and drug use. Among all teens, nonwhites reported equal or higher rates of violent behavior and victimization than whites, but these associations disappeared within the rural-only population. CONCLUSIONS: Rural areas do not appear to provide a strongly protective effect against risk behaviors in teens and may be a risk factor in itself. Community prevention efforts should focus on reaching rural areas and segmenting program content based on need. Where white teens might benefit from an emphasis on preventing tobacco and alcohol use, nonwhite teens would benefit from an emphasis on preventing violence and victimization.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较全国估计的城乡青少年之间的毒品使用和暴力暴露情况。方法:使用2003年青少年风险行为调查中的28个因变量比较了全国农村,城市和郊区青少年的暴力活动,受害,自杀行为,吸烟,饮酒和非法吸毒。结果:总体而言,农村青少年与郊区青少年和城市青少年相比,报告遭受暴力行为,受害,自杀行为和吸毒的许多指标均相同或更高。在所有青少年中,非白人报告的暴力行为和受害率与白人相同或更高,但这些联系在仅农村人口中消失了。结论:农村地区似乎没有对青少年的风险行为提供强有力的保护作用,并且可能本身就是风险因素。社区预防工作应集中在到达农村地区,并根据需要细分计划内容。白人青少年可能会从预防吸烟和酗酒中受益,而非白人青少年会从预防暴力和受害现象中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号