首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Pelvic floor muscle behavior during Valsalva leak point pressure measurement in males and females affected by stress urinary incontinence.
【24h】

Pelvic floor muscle behavior during Valsalva leak point pressure measurement in males and females affected by stress urinary incontinence.

机译:压力性尿失禁影响男性和女性Valsalva泄漏点压力测量期间的骨盆底肌肉行为。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: We evaluated pelvic floor muscle (PFM) behavior during Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) measurement in males and females affected by stress urinary incontinence and investigated whether VLPP results are influenced by PFM contraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 females and 14 males underwent surface electromyographic (EMG) recording of PFM activity while performing VLPP. We investigated 2 conditions, VLPP during spontaneous strain (test A), and with simultaneous relaxation of the pelvic floor (test B). We analyzed average EMG activity (microV) at rest and during VLPP in tests A and B, the increasing EMG activity during tests A and B (the difference between average EMG activity during tests A and B and at rest), and the mean duration (seconds) of EMG activity during tests A and B. RESULTS: We detected a significant increase in EMG activity during tests A and B as compared to activity at rest (p <0.0001). Increasing EMG activity during test B was significantly reduced in females (p <0.05) but not in males. During test A patients reporting urinary incontinence showed a significantly lower EMG activity than that of continent patients (p <0.05). A significant reduction in maximum abdominal pressure was detected in test B compared to test A, but there was no difference in VLPP values between tests A and B. CONCLUSIONS: PFM activity significantly increases during VLPP measurement. Eliminating muscular contraction of the pelvic floor does not significantly alter VLPP results.
机译:目的:我们评估了在压力性尿失禁影响的男性和女性的瓦尔瓦尔漏点压力(VLPP)测量期间的骨盆底肌肉(PFM)行为,并调查了VLPP结果是否受PFM收缩影响。材料与方法:共有25名女性和14名男性在进行VLPP时进行了表面肌电图(EMG)记录PFM活性。我们研究了两种情况,即自发性应变期间的VLPP(测试A)和同时松弛的骨盆底(测试B)。我们分析了测试A和B中静态和VLPP期间的平均EMG活性(microV),测试A和B中EMG的活性增加(测试A和B中和静态的平均EMG活性之差)和平均持续时间结果:测试A和B中的EMG活动与静止时相比显着增加(p <0.0001)。在女性中,测试B期间增加的EMG活性显着降低(p <0.05),而男性则没有。在测试期间,报告尿失禁的患者的肌电图活性明显低于大陆患者(p <0.05)。与测试A相比,测试B中最大腹部压力明显降低,但测试A和测试B之间的VLPP值没有差异。结论:在VLPP测量期间,PFM活性显着增加。消除骨盆底的肌肉收缩不会明显改变VLPP结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号