...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
【24h】

The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.

机译:瓷抛光系统对长石瓷的颜色和表面纹理的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: After the adjustment of glazed porcelain surfaces, the surfaces are roughened and must be reglazed or polished with different porcelain polishing systems to improve the esthetic appearance and strength of the porcelain restorations. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of different porcelain polishing methods on the color and surface texture of a feldspathic ceramic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety porcelain (Vitadur Alpha) discs (10 x 2 mm) were fabricated in a silicone mold and divided into 9 groups (n=10). A medium-grit diamond rotary cutting instrument was used to remove the glaze layer, and then the surface was polished using 1 of the 4 following polishing systems or a combination thereof: polishing paste (Ultra II), polishing stick (Diamond Stick), polishing wheel (CeraMaster), or an adjustment kit (Porcelain Adjustment Kit). No surface treatments were applied to the control group. Color measurements were made using a colorimeter (Minolta CR-321ChromaMeter) according to the CIE L( *)a( *)b( *) color system. Color differences (DeltaE) between the control group and experimental groups were calculated. The acceptable level was chosen as 3.3 DeltaE units. Then the surface roughness (Ra) (microm) of the same specimens was evaluated using a profilometer. The data were statistically analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests (alpha=.05). To evaluate the effects of the polishing systems on the ceramic surfaces at a microscopic level, an additional 9 feldspathic ceramic specimens were prepared and polished to represent each of the 9 groups. These specimens were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: Polishing techniques significantly affected the color of the feldspathic ceramic (P<.001). The DeltaE values ranged from 1.03 to 3.36. No significant differences were found within the adjustment kit groups or within the polishing wheel groups. All specimens polished with the various techniques showed significantly different Ra values than the control specimens (P<.001), except for the groups polished using the adjustment kit. The highest Ra and DeltaE values were obtained with the use of polishing paste and polishing stick alone (P<.001). The SEM observations demonstrated that the polishing techniques affected the smoothness of the porcelain surface. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of the polishing techniques showed that the use of an adjustment kit alone or preceding polishing paste or polishing stick application created surfaces as smooth as glazed specimens. The use of polishing paste alone did not improve the smoothness of the porcelain surface. The color differences of all groups were found to be at the acceptable level.
机译:问题陈述:调整釉面瓷器表面后,应使它们变粗糙,并且必须使用不同的瓷器抛光系统上釉或抛光,以改善瓷器修复体的美学外观和强度。目的:这项体外研究的目的是比较不同瓷器抛光方法对长石陶瓷的颜色和表面纹理的影响。材料与方法:在硅树脂模具中制作90个瓷盘(Vitadur Alpha)(10 x 2毫米),分为9组(n = 10)。使用中粒度金刚石旋转切割仪去除釉层,然后使用以下四种抛光系统中的一种或其组合对表面进行抛光:抛光膏(Ultra II),抛光棒(Diamond Stick),抛光轮(CeraMaster)或调整套件(陶瓷调整套件)。对照组没有进行表面处理。根据CIE L(*)a(*)b(*)色彩系统,使用比色计(Minolta CR-321ChromaMeter)进行颜色测量。计算对照组和实验组之间的色差(DeltaE)。可接受级别选择为3.3 DeltaE单位。然后使用轮廓仪评估相同样品的表面粗糙度(Ra)(微米)。通过方差单向分析和Tukey HSD检验(alpha = .05)对数据进行统计分析。为了在微观水平上评估抛光系统对陶瓷表面的影响,准备了另外9个长石质陶瓷样品并进行了抛光,以代表9组中的每组。这些样品在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下检查。结果:抛光技术显着影响了长石陶瓷的颜色(P <.001)。 DeltaE值的范围为1.03至3.36。在调整套件组或抛光轮组之间没有发现显着差异。除使用调整套件抛光的组外,所有使用各种技术抛光的样品均显示出与对照样品相比显着不同的Ra值(P <.001)。单独使用抛光膏和抛光棒可获得最高的Ra和DeltaE值(P <.001)。 SEM观察表明,抛光技术会影响瓷器表面的光滑度。结论:对抛光技术的评估表明,单独使用调整套件或使用先前的抛光膏或抛光棒可产生光滑的表面,像玻璃样品一样。单独使用抛光膏并不能提高瓷器表面的光滑度。发现所有组的色差都在可接受的水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号