首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic.
【24h】

Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic.

机译:陶瓷表面处理和树脂胶粘剂对玻璃陶瓷微拉伸粘合强度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: It is not clear how different glass ceramic surface pretreatments influence the bonding capacity of various luting agents to these surfaces. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) of 3 resin cements to a lithia disilicate-based ceramic submitted to 2 surface conditioning treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen 5 x 6 x 8-mm ceramic (IPS Empress 2) blocks were fabricated according to manufacturer's instructions and duplicated in composite resin (Tetric Ceram). Ceramic blocks were polished and divided into 2 groups (n=9/treatment): no conditioning (no-conditioning/control), or 5% hydrofluoric acid etching for 20 seconds and silanization for 1 minute (HF + SIL). Ceramic blocks were cemented to the composite resin blocks with 1 self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem) or 1 of 2 resin-based luting agents (Multilink or Panavia F), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The composite resin-ceramic blocks were stored in humidity at 37 degrees C for 7 days and serially sectioned to produce 25 beam specimens per group with a 1.0-mm(2) cross-sectional area. Specimens were thermal cycled (5000 cycles, 5 degrees C-55 degrees C) and tested in tension at 1 mm/min. Microtensile bond strength data (MPa) were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparisons tests (alpha=.05). Fractured specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope (x40) and classified as adhesive, mixed, or cohesive. RESULTS: The surface conditioning factor was significant (HF+SIL > no-conditioning) (P<.0001). Considering the unconditioned groups, the microTBS of RelyX Unicem was significantly higher (9.6 +/- 1.9) than that of Multilink (6.2 +/- 1.2) and Panavia F (7.4 +/- 1.9). Previous etching and silanization yielded statistically higher microTBS values for RelyX Unicem (18.8 +/- 3.5) and Multilink (17.4 +/- 3.0) when compared to Panavia F (15.7 +/- 3.8). Spontaneous debonding after thermal cycling was detected when luting agents were applied to untreated ceramic surfaces. CONCLUSION: Etching and silanization treatments appear to be crucial for resin bonding to a lithia disilicate-based ceramic, regardless of the resin cement used.
机译:问题陈述:尚不清楚不同的玻璃陶瓷表面预处理如何影响各种浸润剂与这些表面的粘合能力。目的:本研究的目的是评估3种树脂水泥与经过2种表面调节处理的以锂硅酸二硅酸盐为基的陶瓷的微拉伸粘结强度(microTBS)。材料和方法:根据制造商的说明制造了18个5 x 6 x 8毫米陶瓷(IPS Empress 2)块,并在复合树脂(Tetric Ceram)中复制。抛光陶瓷块并将其分为2组(n = 9 /处理):无调节(无调节/对照),或5%氢氟酸蚀刻20秒并硅烷化1分钟(HF + SIL)。根据制造商的说明,用一种自粘通用树脂胶粘剂(RelyX Unicem)或两种基于树脂的胶粘剂中的一种(Multilink或Panavia F)将陶瓷块粘合到复合树脂块上。将复合树脂陶瓷块在37°C的湿度下存储7天,然后连续切片以每组生产25个束试样,其横截面面积为1.0mm(2)。对样品进行热循环(5000个循环,5摄氏度至55摄氏度),并以1 mm / min的张力进行测试。通过方差的2通分析和Tukey多重比较测试(alpha = .05)分析了微拉伸粘合强度数据(MPa)。用立体显微镜(x40)检查断裂的样品,并将其分类为粘合剂,混合粘合剂或内聚粘合剂。结果:表面调节因子显着(HF + SIL>无调节)(P <.0001)。考虑到无条件组,RelyX Unicem的microTBS显着高于Multilink(6.2 +/- 1.2)和Panavia F(7.4 +/- 1.9)的microTBS(9.6 +/- 1.9)。与Panavia F(15.7 +/- 3.8)相比,先前的蚀刻和硅烷化处理产生了RelyX Unicem(18.8 +/- 3.5)和Multilink(17.4 +/- 3.0)的统计更高的microTBS值。当在未经处理的陶瓷表面上涂上浸润剂时,在热循环后会发现自发剥离。结论:无论使用何种树脂胶结剂,蚀刻和硅烷化处理对于将树脂粘结到基于锂的二硅酸盐基陶瓷看来都是至关重要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号