...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >Effect of multi-adhesive layering on retention of extraoral maxillofacial silicone prostheses in vivo.
【24h】

Effect of multi-adhesive layering on retention of extraoral maxillofacial silicone prostheses in vivo.

机译:多胶层对保留口腔颌面部有机硅假体的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Loss of retention of maxillofacial prostheses often makes the margin visible or the prosthesis dislodge. Using several medical adhesives in combination may improve retention. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of single- and multi-adhesive layering of 2 adhesives on the retention of maxillofacial silicone elastomer strips adhered to the skin of human forearms using a peel test. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Power analysis from a previous study and a pilot trial specified at least 20 subjects. Eight Silastic Adhesive A/MDX4-4210 silicone rubber strips (N=240) were applied in a predetermined random order to the left and right ventral forearms of 30 IRB-approved human subjects. Skin-Prep Protective Dressing was applied. Secure 2 Medical Adhesive (SMA) and Epithane-3 (E3) adhesive were used alone or as SMA/E3 or E3/SMA sandwiches (from skin to prosthesis) to adhere strips. Strips were peeled 6 hours later in a universal testing machine at 10 cm/min and data reported in N/m. Paired t tests were used to evaluate left and right arm differences. A Friedman test for nonparametric correlated data with within-subject design was performed, determining differences between both adhesives singly and in combination (alpha=.05). RESULTS: Tests of left-right differences were insignificant ( P =0.43), so the data from both arms were combined. Many strips with E3 did not adhere before testing and were counted as 0 adhesion. Median peel strengths (and 25th and 75th percentiles) in N/m were: SMA = 76.1 (47.1-107), E3 = 6.75 (0.0-25.9), SMA/E3 = 107 (78.0-132), and E3/SMA= 19.6 (6.99-42.4). All 4 variables were significantly different ( P <.0005). CONCLUSION: The multi-adhesive combination of SMA/E3 had the highest adhesion, followed, in order, by SMA alone, E3/ SMA, and E3 alone. Both E3 groups left a difficult-to-remove residue on the skin. SMA/E3 left a halo-like residue on the skin at the periphery of the strips from the E3 leaking around the SMA. SMA remained adherent to the prosthetic material.
机译:问题陈述:颌面部假体的保持力丧失通常会使边缘可见或假体移位。结合使用几种医用胶粘剂可以改善保留率。目的:本研究的目的是使用剥离试验研究两种粘合剂的单粘合剂层和多层粘合剂层对粘附在人前臂皮肤上的颌面硅橡胶弹性体条的保留效果。材料和方法:一项先前研究和一项试验性试验的功效分析指定了至少20名受试者。将八个Silastic Adhesive A / MDX4-4210硅橡胶条(N = 240)以预定的随机顺序应用于30位IRB批准的人类受试者的左右前臂。应用了Srep-Prep防护敷料。单独使用Secure 2医用粘合剂(SMA)和Epithane-3(E3)粘合剂,或将SMA / E3或E3 / SMA三明治(从皮肤到假体)用作粘合条。 6小时后,将其在通用测试机中以10cm / min的速度剥离并以N / m报告数据。配对的t检验用于评估左右臂的差异。使用受试者内部设计对非参数相关数据进行弗里德曼检验,确定两种粘合剂之间的差异(α= .05)。结果:左右差异的检验不明显(P = 0.43),因此将两组的数据进行了合并。在测试之前,许多带有E3的胶条没有粘附,被视为0粘附。以N / m为单位的中值剥离强度(以及第25和75个百分位数)为:SMA = 76.1(47.1-107),E3 = 6.75(0.0-25.9),SMA / E3 = 107(78.0-132)和E3 / SMA = 19.6(6.99-42.4)。所有4个变量均显着不同(P <.0005)。结论:SMA / E3的多粘合剂组合具有最高的粘附性,其次是仅SMA,E3 / SMA和E3。两组E3均在皮肤上留下了难以去除的残留物。 SMA / E3在E3周围的SMA周围泄漏,在条带外围的皮肤上留下类似光晕的残留物。 SMA仍然粘附在修复材料上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号