首页> 外文期刊>Biomolecular engineering >Comparison of two fluorescence immunoassay methods for the detection of endocrine disrupting chemicals in water
【24h】

Comparison of two fluorescence immunoassay methods for the detection of endocrine disrupting chemicals in water

机译:两种用于检测水中内分泌干扰物的荧光免疫测定方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We describe two fluorescence immunoassays capable of detecting endocrine disrupting compounds in waste water. The first fluorescence method is a heterogeneous assay using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) detection. The second method is a homogeneous assay that utilizes energy transfer (ETIA). Both fluorescence immunoassays are compared with respect to detection principle and ability to quantify the model analytes estrone, estradiol, and ethinylestradiol in a complex matrix regarding recovery rates and limits of detection. Calibrations were performed for the three analytes using both fluorescence methods. Limits of detection between 0.01 and 0.85 μg/l are achieved. In addition, measurements in synthetic waste water spiked with the analytes were performed. Both immunoassays allow the detection in waste water with recovery rates in the range of 70-112%.
机译:我们描述了两种能够检测废水中内分泌干扰化合物的荧光免疫测定方法。第一种荧光方法是使用全内反射荧光(TIRF)检测的异质分析。第二种方法是利用能量转移(ETIA)的均相测定。比较两种荧光免疫测定的检测原理和定量分析复杂基质中模型分析物雌酮,雌二醇和炔雌醇的能力,涉及回收率和检测限。使用两种荧光方法对三种分析物进行了校准。检出限在0.01和0.85μg/ l之间。另外,在掺有分析物的合成废水中进行了测量。两种免疫测定均允许在废水中进行检测,回收率范围为70-112%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号