...
首页> 外文期刊>The annals of pharmacotherapy >Systematic reviews of pharmacy practice research: methodologic issues in searching, evaluating, interpreting, and disseminating results.
【24h】

Systematic reviews of pharmacy practice research: methodologic issues in searching, evaluating, interpreting, and disseminating results.

机译:药学实践研究的系统评价:搜索,评估,解释和传播结果的方法论问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Although there has been a large number of trials on pharmacist care, often demonstrating clinically significant benefits, the trials generally have not changed practice or healthcare policy. What is needed are focused evidence syntheses, such as a systematic review. A systematic review is defined as a summary that addresses a focused clinical question, using methods to reduce the likelihood of bias. These reviews, which are the highest level of evidence, can help to impact policy by bringing together results of various trials. However, systematic reviews of practice research pose some unique methodologic challenges, including issues with searching, interpreting, and evaluating the available research. Well-conducted systematic reviews of pharmacist interventions could go a long way toward changing pharmacy practice and healthcare policy to recognize the important impact that pharmacists could have in the healthcare system.
机译:尽管有大量关于药剂师护理的试验,通常显示出临床上的显着益处,但是这些试验通常并没有改变实践或医疗保健政策。需要有重点的证据综合,例如系统的审查。系统评价被定义为使用可降低偏倚可能性的方法解决的重点临床问题的摘要。这些审查是最高级别的证据,可以通过汇总各种试验的结果来帮助影响政策。但是,对实践研究的系统评价带来了一些独特的方法论挑战,包括搜索,解释和评估现有研究的问题。对药剂师干预措施进行妥善的系统评价可能会大大有助于改变药剂师的执业方式和医疗保健政策,从而认识到药剂师可能对医疗保健系统产生的重要影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号