首页> 外文期刊>The annals of pharmacotherapy >Review of continuous-infusion vancomycin [Revisión de vancomicina en infusión continua]
【24h】

Review of continuous-infusion vancomycin [Revisión de vancomicina en infusión continua]

机译:持续输注万古霉素的综述[持续输注万古霉素的综述]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of administering vancomycin as a continuous infusion. DATA SOURCES: Literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1977-September 2012), Embase (1977-September 2012), and Google Scholar, using the terms vancomycin, continuous, discontinuous, infusion, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and nephrotoxicity. In addition, reference citations from publications identified were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language articles identified from the data sources were evaluated. Studies including more than 30 adults were included in the safety and efficacy review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carry a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Vancomycin is commonly prescribed for invasive MRSA infections and has been traditionally administered as an intermittent infusion. Administering vancomycin as a continuous infusion is a novel approach to improving its efficacy and safety profile. Fourteen clinical trials were reviewed (2 prospective, 1 meta-analysis, 11 retrospective). The pharmacodynamic profiles between continuous-infusion vancomycin and intermittentinfusion vancomycin were comparable. Continuous-infusion therapy did not significantly improve the efficacy of vancomycin in the treatment of invasive MRSA infections. Conflicting results exist regarding the safety profile of continuousinfusion compared with intermittent-infusion vancomycin. The only published prospective randomized clinical trial comparing continuous infusion with intermittent therapy found no significant difference in the rates of nephrotoxicity. The data from retrospective studies are heterogeneous and show variable rates of nephrotoxicity. In general, compatibility information for administering vancomycin as a continuous infusion is unavailable. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, currently available evidence is insufficient to conclude whether an improvement in vancomycin efficacy exists when it is administered as a continuous infusion. The risk of nephrotoxicity associated with continuousinfusion vancomycin requires further investigation in prospective randomized trials. Specific patient populations that would benefit from continuous-infusion vancomycin have yet to be determined.
机译:目的:评价万古霉素连续输注的有效性和安全性。数据来源:文献通过MEDLINE(1977年9月至2012年9月),Embase(1977年9月至2012年9月)和Google学术搜索,使用了万古霉素,连续,不连续,输注,药代动力学,药效学和肾毒性术语。此外,还对已鉴定出版物的参考文献进行了审查。研究选择和数据提取:对从数据源中识别出的所有英语文章进行评估。包括30多个成年人在内的研究被纳入安全性和有效性评价。数据综合:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)引起的感染具有很高的发病率和死亡率风险。万古霉素通常用于侵袭性MRSA感染,传统上已作为间歇输注给药。连续输注万古霉素是一种改善其疗效和安全性的新颖方法。回顾了14项临床试验(2项前瞻性,1项荟萃分析,11项回顾性研究)。连续输注万古霉素和间歇输注万古霉素之间的药效学特征相当。连续输注疗法并未显着提高万古霉素在侵袭性MRSA感染中的疗效。与持续输注万古霉素相比,持续输注的安全性存在矛盾的结果。唯一发表的比较连续输注与间歇治疗的前瞻性随机临床试验发现,肾毒性的发生率无显着差异。回顾性研究的数据是异质的,显示出不同程度的肾毒性。通常,无法获得用于连续输注万古霉素的相容性信息。结论:总体而言,当前可获得的证据不足以断定以连续输注方式给药时万古霉素疗效是否存在改善。与持续输注万古霉素有关的肾毒性风险需要在前瞻性随机试验中进一步研究。从连续输注万古霉素中获益的特定患者人群尚未确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号