...
首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of occupational hygiene. >Penetration of diesel exhaust particles through commercially available dust half masks
【24h】

Penetration of diesel exhaust particles through commercially available dust half masks

机译:柴油机废气颗粒通过市售的防尘半面罩渗透

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Half masks are certified by the competent, national institutionsNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the USA and the respective European national institutions applying common European regulations. However, certification testing is conducted with particles of NaCl, paraffin oil, or dioctyl phthalate (DOP) and at the constant flow rate, whereas particles commonly found in workplaces may differ in size, shape, and morphology from these particles. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate filtration efficiency of commercially available filtering facepiece half masks under the condition of exposure to diesel fumes. In this study, we focused on the particulate phase [diesel exhaust particles (DEP)] of three (petroleum diesel, ecodiesel, and biodiesel) diesel fuel combustion types. Two types of European standard-certified half masks, FFP2 and FFP - Filtering Facepiece, and three types of popular diesel fuels were tested. The study showed that the filtration efficiencies for each examined half mask and for each of diesel exhaust fumes were lower than the minimum filtration efficiency required for the standard test aerosols by the European standards. For FFP2 and FFP3 particulate half masks, standard minimum filtration efficiency is 94 and 99%, respectively, whereas 8489% of mass of DEP from various fuels were filtered by the tested FFP2 and only 7586% by the FFP3. The study indicated that DEP is more penetrating for these filters than the standard salt or paraffin oil test aerosols. The study also showed that the most penetrating DEP are probably in the 30- to 300-nm size range, regardless of the fuel type and the half-mask model. Finally, the pressure drops across both half masks during the 80-min tests remained below an acceptable maximum of breathing resistanceregardless of the fuel types. The respiratory system, during 40-min test exposures, may be exposed to 1216mg of DEP if a FFP2 or FFP3 particulate half mask is used. To conclude, commercially available half masks may not ensure a sufficient level of protection of the respiratory tract against diesel exhaust fumes.
机译:半面罩由主管的国家机构,美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)和采用共同欧洲法规的各个欧洲国家机构认证。但是,使用NaCl,石蜡油或邻苯二甲酸二辛酯(DOP)的颗粒并以恒定的流量进行认证测试,而工作场所中常见的颗粒的尺寸,形状和形态可能与这些颗粒不同。因此,本研究的目的是研究在暴露于柴油机烟气条件下市售过滤面罩半面罩的过滤效率。在这项研究中,我们重点研究了三种(石油柴油,生态柴油和生物柴油)柴油燃烧类型的颗粒相[柴油机排气颗粒(DEP)]。测试了两种通过欧洲标准认证的半面罩FFP2和FFP-过滤面罩,以及三种流行的柴油。研究表明,每个检查的半面罩和每种柴油机废气的过滤效率均低于欧洲标准测试气雾剂所需的最低过滤效率。对于FFP2和FFP3颗粒半面罩,标准的最低过滤效率分别为94和99%,而来自各种燃料的DEP质量的8489%被测试的FFP2过滤,而只有FFP3的7586%。研究表明,DEP比标准盐或石蜡油测试气雾剂更能渗透这些过滤器。该研究还表明,无论燃料类型和半掩膜型号如何,最渗透的DEP可能在30至300 nm的尺寸范围内。最后,无论燃料类型如何,在80分钟的测试过程中,两个半面罩上的压降均保持在可接受的最大呼吸阻力以下。如果使用FFP2或FFP3颗粒半面罩,则在40分钟的测试暴露中,呼吸系统可能暴露于1216mg的DEP中。总而言之,市售的半面罩可能无法确保呼吸道对柴油机排气烟气的防护水平足够。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号