首页> 外文期刊>The journal of pain: official journal of the American Pain Society >Response to Stacey and Moller's letter to the Editor
【24h】

Response to Stacey and Moller's letter to the Editor

机译:回应史黛西和莫勒给编辑的信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We appreciate the authors' interest in the study and belief that rigorous studies are needed to address the potential role, or not, of cannabinoids in pain research, particularly in the area of neuropathic pain, where upwards of 40-60% of patients fail to get relief from current treatments.4 We agree that much is still unknown regarding the potential use of cannabis as medicine, such as How frequently would it need to be administered? Is any benefit sustainable? What are the short- and long-term effects on daily functioning (positive and negative)? What is the therapeutic window?
机译:我们赞赏作者对这项研究的兴趣,并相信需要进行严格的研究才能解决大麻素在疼痛研究中的潜在作用,尤其是在神经性疼痛领域,其中超过40-60%的患者未能做到这一点从目前的治疗中获得缓解。4我们同意,关于大麻作为药物的潜在用途仍存在很多未知数,例如需要多久使用一次?有没有可持续的收益?对日常功能的短期和长期影响(正面和负面)是什么?什么是治疗窗口?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号