首页> 外文期刊>The journal of pain: official journal of the American Pain Society >Development and preliminary testing of a computerized adaptive assessment of chronic pain.
【24h】

Development and preliminary testing of a computerized adaptive assessment of chronic pain.

机译:慢性疼痛的计算机适应性评估的开发和初步测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this article is to report the development and preliminary testing of a prototype computerized adaptive test of chronic pain (CHRONIC PAIN-CAT) conducted in 2 stages: (1) evaluation of various item selection and stopping rules through real data-simulated administrations of CHRONIC PAIN-CAT; (2) a feasibility study of the actual prototype CHRONIC PAIN-CAT assessment system conducted in a pilot sample. Item calibrations developed from a US general population sample (N = 782) were used to program a pain severity and impact item bank (kappa = 45), and real data simulations were conducted to determine a CAT stopping rule. The CHRONIC PAIN-CAT was programmed on a tablet PC using QualityMetric's Dynamic Health Assessment (DYHNA) software and administered to a clinical sample of pain sufferers (n = 100). The CAT was completed in significantly less time than the static (full item bank) assessment (P < .001). On average, 5.6 items were dynamically administered by CAT to achieve a precise score. Scores estimated from the 2 assessments were highly correlated (r = .89), and both assessments discriminated across pain severity levels (P < .001, RV = .95). Patients' evaluations of the CHRONIC PAIN-CAT were favorable. PERSPECTIVE: This report demonstrates that the CHRONIC PAIN-CAT is feasible for administration in a clinic. The application has the potential to improve pain assessment and help clinicians manage chronic pain.
机译:本文旨在报告分两个阶段进行的原型计算机化慢性疼痛适应性测试(CHRONIC PAIN-CAT)的开发和初步测试:(1)通过真实数据模拟的管理评估各种项目选择和停止规则慢性疼痛猫(2)在试点样本中对实际原型CHRONIC PAIN-CAT评估系统进行可行性研究。从美国普通人群样本(N = 782)开发的项目校准用于编程疼痛严重程度和影响项目库(kappa = 45),并进行了真实数据模拟以确定CAT停止规则。使用QualityMetric的动态健康评估(DYHNA)软件在Tablet PC上对CHAINIC PAIN-CAT进行编程,然后对疼痛患者的临床样本进行管理(n = 100)。与静态(完整项目库)评估相比,完成CAT的时间要少得多(P <.001)。 CAT平均动态管理5.6个项目,以取得准确的分数。从这两次评估中估计出的分数高度相关(r = .89),并且两种评估都可以区分疼痛的严重程度(P <.001,RV = .95)。患者对CHRONIC PAIN-CAT的评价良好。观点:该报告表明,慢性疼痛-CAT适用于临床管理。该应用程序有可能改善疼痛评估并帮助临床医生管理慢性疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号