首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease >A controlled comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder: eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs. emotional freedom techniques.
【24h】

A controlled comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder: eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs. emotional freedom techniques.

机译:对照比较两种心理疗法对创伤后应激障碍的有效性和效率:眼球运动脱敏和后处理与情感自由技术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The present study reports on the first ever controlled comparison between eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and emotional freedom techniques (EFT) for posttraumatic stress disorder. A total of 46 participants were randomized to either EMDR (n = 23) or EFT (n = 23). The participants were assessed at baseline and then reassessed after an 8-week waiting period. Two further blind assessments were conducted at posttreatment and 3-months follow-up. Overall, the results indicated that both interventions produced significant therapeutic gains at posttreatment and follow-up in an equal number of sessions. Similar treatment effect sizes were observed in both treatment groups. Regarding clinical significant changes, a slightly higher proportion of patients in the EMDR group produced substantial clinical changes compared with the EFT group. Given the speculative nature of the theoretical basis of EFT, a dismantling study on the active ingredients of EFT should be subject to future research.
机译:本研究报告了针对创伤后应激障碍的眼动脱敏和后处理(EMDR)和情绪自由技术(EFT)之间的首次受控比较。共有46名参与者被随机分为EMDR(n = 23)或EFT(n = 23)。在基线时对参与者进行评估,然后在等待了8周的时间后对其进行了重新评估。在治疗后和3个月的随访中还进行了两次盲目评估。总体而言,结果表明,两种干预措施在治疗后和随访期间均产生了显着的治疗效果。在两个治疗组中观察到相似的治疗效果大小。关于临床显着变化,与EFT组相比,EMDR组中稍高比例的患者发生了实质性临床变化。考虑到电子转帐理论基础的推测性,对电子转帐有效成分的拆解研究应在未来进行研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

开通会员

免费获取本篇文献

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号