...
首页> 外文期刊>Quarterly Journal of Forestry >Social or Anti-social Forestry?Evaluating approaches for woodland working groups
【24h】

Social or Anti-social Forestry?Evaluating approaches for woodland working groups

机译:社会还是反社会林业?林地工作组的评估方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

John Bell and Roger Cutting examine the structures and economic operation of community woodland co-operatives.social forestry' has for a number of years been a useful term of choice for describing woodland working groups, often organised as co-operatives, to provide members with access to logs at discounted rates in what has also been called a 'logs for labour'arrangement. A national survey carried out in December 2013 identified 60 woodland social enterprise groups fulfilling these criteria (Swade et al., 2013). Work completed more recently by Forest Research identified 650 community working groups across theUK, of which 300 were found in England, 200 in Scotland and 150 Wales (Ambrose-Oji, 2013). Furthermore, work carried out by Forest Research indicates a 67% increase in numbers of community woodland groups in the last five years (Edwards et. al., 2009; Stewart and Edwards, 2013).
机译:John Bell和Roger Cutting考察了社区林地合作社的结构和经济运作。多年来,“社会林业”一直是描述林地工作组(通常由合作社组织)以向成员提供服务的有用选择。以所谓的“劳动日志”安排以折扣价使用日志。 2013年12月进行的全国调查确定了60个符合这些标准的林地社会企业集团(Swade等,2013)。森林研究最近完成的工作确定了英国的650个社区工作组,其中在英格兰有300个,在苏格兰有200个,在威尔士有150个(Ambrose-Oji,2013年)。此外,森林研究公司所做的工作表明,过去五年来社区林地数量增加了67%(Edwards等,2009; Stewart和Edwards,2013)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号