...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Development Studies >Receive Grants or Perish? The Survival Prospects of Ugandan Non-governmental Organisations
【24h】

Receive Grants or Perish? The Survival Prospects of Ugandan Non-governmental Organisations

机译:领取补助金还是灭亡?乌干达非政府组织的生存前景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study examines survival patterns in a large, representative panel of Ugandan non-governmental organisations (NGOs) between 2002 and 2008. It finds no evidence that more effective or more altruistic NGOs have a greater likelihood of survival. The main determinant of survival appears to be access to grants, and NGOs without grants struggle to survive. An investigation of the grant allocation mechanism suggests that effectiveness does not increase an NGO's likelihood of receiving a grant. Grant allocation appears to be neither fair nor effective, but rather to be awarded on the basis of habit rather than merit: once a grant has been allocated there is a strong tendency for it to persist. The odds are stacked against small NGOs that have not previously received grants. A picture emerges of two parallel NGO worlds: one where revenues are small, variable and hard to come by and survival is not very likely, and the other where revenues are high, more stable and more accessible and survival is more likely. The study suggests it may be difficult for an NGO to move from the former to the latter.
机译:这项研究调查了2002年至2008年之间由乌干达非政府组织(NGOs)组成的大型代表小组的生存模式。没有发现证据表明,更有效或更利他的NGO具有更大的生存可能性。生存的主要决定因素似乎是能否获得赠款,而没有赠款的非政府组织则难以生存。对赠款分配机制的调查表明,有效性并不会增加非政府组织获得赠款的可能性。赠款分配似乎既不公平也不有效,而是根据习惯而非功绩来授予:一旦分配了赠款,就有很强的持久性。与以前未获得资助的小型非政府组织相比,赔率很高。出现了两个平行的非政府组织世界:一个收入很小,可变且难以获得,生存的可能性很小;另一个则是收入很高,更稳定,更容易获得和生存的可能性。该研究表明,非政府组织可能很难从前者转移到后者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号