首页> 外文期刊>The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine >Comparison of rapid intrapartum screening methods for group B streptococcal vaginal colonization.
【24h】

Comparison of rapid intrapartum screening methods for group B streptococcal vaginal colonization.

机译:B组链球菌阴道定植的快速产期筛查方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare optical immunoassay (OIA) and rapid polymerase-chain reaction (PCR) with enrichment broth culture for intrapartum detection of vaginal group B streptococcal (GBS) colonization. METHODS: Paired vaginal swabs from 315 consecutive term pregnant women at the time of presentation for delivery to a university medical center were tested for GBS by OIA, PCR, and culture. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: Vaginal colonization was identified by culture in 56 subjects (17.8%). The sensitivity of OIA (7.1%, 95% confidence interval 5.1-9.5%) was significantly less than that of unenhanced rapid PCR (62.5%, 95% CI 48.5-74.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Neither PCR nor OIA is sufficiently sensitive for intrapartum detection of vaginal GBS colonization. Rapid PCR is more sensitive, but further improvements in technique to increase sensitivity will be necessary if PCR is to have a useful role in the management of women at time of presentation for delivery.
机译:目的:比较光学免疫分析(OIA)和快速聚合酶链反应(PCR)与富集肉汤培养物在产时检测阴道内B组链球菌(GBS)定植的情况。方法:对来自315名连续足月孕妇的配对阴道拭子,在出现时准备分娩到大学医学中心,通过OIA,PCR和培养进行了GBS检测。计算敏感性,特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。结果:通过培养确定了56名受试者中的阴道定植(17.8%)。 OIA的敏感性(7.1%,95%置信区间5.1-9.5%)显着低于未增强的快速PCR的敏感性(62.5%,95%CI 48.5-74.8%)。结论:无论是PCR还是OIA都不足以对阴道内GBS菌落的产时检测产生足够的敏感性。快速PCR更加敏感,但是如果PCR要在分娩时在妇女管理中发挥有用作用,则有必要进一步提高敏感性的技术改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号