首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Comparison of Health Care Costs Between Aseptic and Two Stage Septic Hip Revision
【24h】

Comparison of Health Care Costs Between Aseptic and Two Stage Septic Hip Revision

机译:无菌和两阶段无菌髋关节翻修之间的医疗保健费用比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The number of septic and aseptic total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions will increase, which involves a greater financial burden. We here provide a retrospective consecutive analysis of the major variable direct costs involved in revision THA for aseptic and septic failure. A total of 144 patients (30 septic, 114 aseptic) treated between January 1, 2009 and March 31, 2012 was included. The management of septic THA loosening is much more expensive than that of aseptic loosening ($14,379.8 vs. $5,487.4). This difference is mainly attributable to the two-stage exchange technique used for septic failure (hospital stay: 40.2 vs. 15.6 days) and significantly higher implant costs ($3,930.9 vs. $2,298.2). The septic implantation part is on average $3,384.6 more expensive than aseptic procedures (P < .001). (c) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:化脓性和无菌性全髋关节置换术(THA)的修订数量将增加,这将带来更大的经济负担。我们在此对THA修订版中因无菌和败血症导致的主要可变直接费用进行回顾性连续分析。在2009年1月1日至2012年3月31日期间,共治疗144例患者(30例败血症,114例无菌)。化脓性THA松弛的管理比无菌性THA的管理贵得多(分别为$ 14,379.8和$ 5,487.4)。这种差异主要归因于用于败血性衰竭的两阶段交换技术(医院住院时间:40.2 vs. 15.6天)和明显更高的植入物成本($ 3,930.9 vs. $ 2,298.2)。化粪池植入部分平均比无菌手术贵3,384.6美元(P <.001)。 (c)2014 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号