...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >How Do Frozen and Permanent Histopathologic Diagnoses Compare for Staged Revision After Periprosthetic Hip Infections?
【24h】

How Do Frozen and Permanent Histopathologic Diagnoses Compare for Staged Revision After Periprosthetic Hip Infections?

机译:假体周围性髋部感染后,冷冻和永久组织病理学检查与分期翻修的比较如何?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Histopathologic analysis of frozen tissue samples is used to aid the intraoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic hip infections, but there are concerns about reliability. The purposes of this study were to determine the rate of concordance between diagnoses of infection made with frozen and permanent sections and to assess how discrepancies affected patient outcomes. A total of 282 samples from 62 patients were collected for frozen and permanent section analysis. There was concordance in 274 samples (97%). In 1 case, discrepancies led to retention of components during persistent infection, and the patient required further revision and antibiotics until infection free. Otherwise, discrepancies did not affect patient outcomes. There is good concordance between frozen and permanent sections for diagnosing periprosthetic hip infection and rarely do these discrepancies affect management.
机译:冷冻组织样本的组织病理学分析可用于术中诊断假体周围的髋部感染,但存在可靠性问题。这项研究的目的是确定冷冻切片和永久切片的感染诊断之间的一致率,并评估差异如何影响患者预后。总共收集了62位患者的282个样本用于冷冻和永久切片分析。 274个样品中有一致性(97%)。在1例病例中,差异导致持续性感染期间保留了成分,并且患者需要进一步翻修和使用抗生素直至无感染。否则,差异不会影响患者预后。冷冻切片和永久性切片之间的一致性很好,可用于诊断假体周围的髋部感染,这些差异很少会影响治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号