首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >A comparison of the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed acetabular sockets in primary total hip arthroplasty.
【24h】

A comparison of the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed acetabular sockets in primary total hip arthroplasty.

机译:骨水泥全聚乙烯和非骨水泥金属支持的髋臼窝在原发性全髋关节置换术中的结果比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compared, after a 10-year-minimum follow-up, the outcome of 50 cemented all-polyethylene Charnley acetabular sockets with that of 51 cementless metal-backed sockets in 2 comparable cohorts of young patients. Although the revision rate for the cemented and cementless group was 28% and 35%, respectively, the revision rate for aseptic loosening was 28% for the cemented and 12% for the cementless group. The mean polyethylene wear was 0.112 and 0.114 mm/y, respectively, for the 2 groups. Linear osteolysis was observed in 18 of 50 cemented sockets. Expansile osteolysis presented in 10 of 51 cementless sockets and only in one of the cemented sockets. In conclusion, cementless components had more durable fixation than cemented components. However, they presented more aggressive expansile osteolysis caused by the coexistence of polyethylene and metal debris.
机译:在至少进行了10年的随访之后,我们比较了2例可比较的年轻患者群体中50例骨水泥全聚乙烯Charnley髋臼窝的结果与51例非骨水泥金属钉臼的结果。尽管非骨水泥组和非骨水泥组的翻修率分别为28%和35%,但非骨水泥组的无菌松动的翻新率分别为28%和12%。两组的平均聚乙烯磨损分别为0.112和0.114 mm / y。在50个胶合套中,有18个观察到线性骨溶解。在51个非骨水泥托槽中有10个出现膨胀性骨溶解,仅在其中一个骨水泥托槽中出现。总之,非骨水泥组件比骨水泥组件具有更持久的固定性。然而,由于聚乙烯和金属碎片的共存,他们表现出更具侵略性的扩张性骨溶解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号