首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Survival analysis of primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: Which designs last?
【24h】

Survival analysis of primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: Which designs last?

机译:原发性骨水泥全膝关节置换术的生存分析:哪种设计可持续?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Both posterior stabilization and metal backing of the tibial component are design changes that could alter the longevity of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Survival analysis data from 16 articles (5,950 knees) were combined to compare design features. No difference was found in survival between posterior stabilized implants and implants that were not stabilized or between metal-backed and all-polyethylene tibial components. Those all-polyethylene tibial components that were not stabilized showed significantly better survival than metal-backed, nonstabilized tibial components and posterior stabilized, metal-backed components (P<.05) but not posterior stabilized, all-polyethylene components. According to the currently available literature, posterior stabilization or metal backing of the tibial component does not improve the longevity of primary cemented fixed bearing condylar-type TKAs.
机译:胫骨组件的后固定和金属支撑都是设计更改,可以改变全膝关节置换术(TKA)的寿命。来自16篇文章(5,950膝)的生存分析数据被组合起来以比较设计特征。后稳定植入物和不稳定的植入物之间或金属支持的胫骨和全聚乙烯胫骨组件之间的存活率均未发现差异。那些未稳定的全聚乙烯胫骨组件比金属支撑的,非稳定的胫骨组件和后稳定的,金属支撑的组件具有更好的生存率(P <.05),但未稳定的后支撑的全聚乙烯组件。根据当前可获得的文献,胫骨组件的后部稳定或金属支撑不能改善初级骨水泥固定固定con突型TKA的寿命。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号