首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Effect of mixing technique on the properties of acrylic bone-cement: a comparison of syringe and bowl mixing systems.
【24h】

Effect of mixing technique on the properties of acrylic bone-cement: a comparison of syringe and bowl mixing systems.

机译:混合技术对丙烯酸骨水泥性能的影响:注射器和碗混合系统的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Syringe mixing systems have been introduced, but few data exist regarding the mechanical performance of cement they produce. We compared the properties of polymethyl methacrylate cement produced by these systems with that produced by a multiaxial bowl. Mixtures of cement were prepared using the Optivac, Cemvac, and Summit syringes and the Summit bowl. The mixtures were cured in molds to create casts that were radiographed and analyzed for void content, then cut into strips, weighed, measured, and tested to failure in 4-point bending. Syringe-mixed cement was of greater density, bending modulus, and bending strength than bowl-mixed cement (Mann-Whitney, P < .01) and contained fewer microvoids and macrovoids (Mann-Whitney, P < .01). No significant differences between the syringes were found for these variables (Kruskall-Wallis, P > .05).
机译:已经引入了注射器混合系统,但是关于它们生产的水泥的机械​​性能的数据很少。我们将这些系统生产的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯水泥与多轴碗生产的水泥性能进行了比较。使用Optivac,Cemvac和Summit注射器以及Summit碗制备水泥混合物。将混合物在模具中固化,制成铸件,进行射线照相并分析空隙含量,然后切成条状,称重,测量并测试4点弯曲是否失败。针筒混合水泥比碗式混合水泥(Mann-Whitney,P <.01)具有更高的密度,弯曲模量和弯曲强度,并且含有更少的微孔和大孔(Mann-Whitney,P <.01)。在这些变量之间,没有发现注射器之间的显着差异(Kruskall-Wallis,P> 0.05)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号