...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments.
【24h】

Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments.

机译:全膝关节置换术后的患者满意度:主观和客观结果评估之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We used a visual analog scale (VAS) to assess the satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a group of 108 patients (126 TKAs) with short-term to medium-term follow-up. We also used the Knee Society scoring system, Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), pain VAS, and survival analysis. A comparison between the subjective and objective outcome systems revealed only poor correlations. This comparison suggests that the concerns and priorities of patients and surgeons differ. The outcome assessed with the satisfaction VAS revealed a significantly better subjective outcome in rheumatoid arthritis patients compared with osteoarthritis patients, whereas Knee Society scores were not different. The satisfaction VAS provides additional information about subjective outcome after TKA.
机译:我们使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估了短期和中期随访的108例患者(126例TKA)中全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的满意度。我们还使用了膝盖协会评分系统,西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学的骨关节炎指数(WOMAC),疼痛VAS和生存分析。主观和客观结果系统之间的比较仅显示出不良的相关性。这种比较表明,患者和外科医生的关注点和优先级有所不同。用满意的VAS评估的结果表明,类风湿性关节炎患者的主观结果明显好于骨关节炎患者,而Knee Society评分没有差异。满意度VAS可提供有关TKA后主观结果的更多信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号