...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of clinical psychiatry >Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists.
【24h】

Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists.

机译:早期职业精神科医生的同行评审观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Peer review is an integral and essential part of modern science. It plays a crucial role in decisions about funding research and what is published in the scientific literature. Why should an early career academic psychiatrist, with a huge burden of time pressures, consider reviewing manuscripts for journals? It offers no financial reward and carries little value for promotion or tenure. Yet reviewing manuscripts for journals is part of professional networking, with implications for future grant applications and letters of reference. In addition, reviewing other scientists' manuscripts will make you a better writer of grant applications and manuscripts yourself. It will expand your knowledge, keep you abreast of developments in the field, and hone critical thinking skills in your area.
机译:同行评审是现代科学不可或缺的组成部分。它在有关资助研究以及科学文献中发表的内容的决策中起着至关重要的作用。为什么在时间压力沉重的情况下,早期职业学术精神病医生会考虑审查期刊的手稿?它没有任何经济上的回报,并且几乎没有升职或任期的价值。但是,审阅期刊手稿是专业网络的一部分,对将来的赠款申请和推荐信有影响。此外,审阅其他科学家的手稿将使您自己成为拨款申请和手稿的更好作者。它将扩展您的知识,使您了解该领域的发展,并磨练您所在领域的批判性思维能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号