首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of ambulatory care management >Comparison of emergency nurses association emergency severity triage and australian emergency mental health triage systems for the evaluation of psychiatric patients
【24h】

Comparison of emergency nurses association emergency severity triage and australian emergency mental health triage systems for the evaluation of psychiatric patients

机译:急诊护士协会紧急严重程度分类与澳大利亚紧急心理健康分类系统对精神病患者评估的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of a triage system in the emergency department allows for the ability to reliably assign patients for treatment within a short amount of time in order to prioritize and treat on the basis of patients injury and illness. A 5 point triage system has been shown to have the highest correlation with effective resource utilizations, lower time to be seen and treatment times, and admission or release outcomes for patients. The problem is, however, that these triage scales were developed on the basis of physical illness and not on the ever-increasing number of patients who present with mental illness. This article compares one physical and one specific mental illness-based triage system to measure the differences in times to be seen by a physician. It found that the specialized psychiatric triage system decreased wait times and allowed symptoms to be addressed sooner for patients presenting with psychiatric complaints.
机译:在急诊科中使用分类系统可以在短时间内可靠地分配患者进行治疗,以便根据患者的受伤和疾病确定优先顺序并进行治疗。已显示五点分类系统与有效资源利用,更少的观察时间和治疗时间以及患者的入院或出院结果具有最高的相关性。然而,问题在于,这些分类标准是根据身体疾病而不是基于精神疾病患者的不断增加而制定的。本文比较了一种基于身体疾病的分类系统和一种基于特定精神疾病的分类系统,以衡量医生所看到的时间差异。研究发现,专用的精神病分诊系统减少了等待时间,并使出现精神病症状的患者可以更快地解决症状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号