首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology >Clinically relevant peach allergy is related to peach lipid transfer protein, Pru p 3, in the Spanish population.
【24h】

Clinically relevant peach allergy is related to peach lipid transfer protein, Pru p 3, in the Spanish population.

机译:临床相关的桃过敏与西班牙人群中的桃脂质转移蛋白Pru p 3有关。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Sensitization to peach and related Rosaceae fruits without clinical expression is commonly observed as the result of the extensive cross-reactivity of IgE antibodies directed toward lipid transfer proteins (LTPs), Bet v 1 homologues, profilins, and carbohydrate determinants. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study whether there are any clinical or immunologic differences between patients allergic to peach and those who have a current clinically irrelevant sensitization to this fruit. METHODS: One hundred subjects with adverse reactions to peach were evaluated by medical history, skin prick tests with fresh peach and purified peach LTP (Pru p 3), and specific IgE determinations to peach, rBet v 1, and rBet v 2 (birch profilin). Clinical reactivity to peach was established by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges. The clinical characteristics and the in vivo and in vitro tests were compared between allergic and nonallergic patients. RESULTS: Peach allergy was confirmed in 76 patients and ruled out in 16; 2 patients dropped out, and the study was not conclusive in 6 individuals (placebo reactors). Pollen allergy was found in 76% of the allergic patients and in 100% of the nonallergic patients. Positive responses to Pru p 3, rBet v 1, and rBet v 2 were observed in 62%, 7%, and 34% of patients allergic to peach, respectively. The sensitization rate to Pru p 3 was significantly higher among subjects allergic than nonallergic to peach (62% vs 31%, P =.02). IgE responses to rBet v 2 were more frequent among subjects allergic to pollen, but no difference was observed in the presence or absence of peach allergy. CONCLUSIONS: Pru p 3 is the major allergen of peach in our population, and the IgE response to this allergen is related to the clinical expression of peach allergy. Sensitization to profilin is observed in those patients with an associated pollen allergy but does not appear to be related to the clinical reactivity to peach.
机译:背景:由于针对脂质转移蛋白(LTP),Bet v 1同源物,蛋白纤溶酶和碳水化合物决定簇的IgE抗体具有广泛的交叉反应性,通常观察到对桃和相关酒渣类水果没有临床表达的过敏。目的:我们的目的是研究对桃子过敏的患者和目前对该桃过敏的临床无关的患者之间是否存在临床或免疫学差异。方法:通过病史,新鲜桃子和纯桃LTP的皮肤点刺试验(Pru p 3)以及桃,rBet v 1和rBet v 2(桦树脯蛋白)的特异性IgE测定,对一百名对桃有不良反应的受试者进行了评估。 )。对桃子的临床反应性是通过双盲,安慰剂控制的食物挑战建立的。比较过敏和非过敏患者的临床特征以及体内和体外试验。结果:桃过敏症的确诊76例,排除了16例。 2名患者退学,对6个人(安慰剂反应器)进行的研究不是结论性的。在76%的过敏患者和100%的非过敏患者中发现花粉过敏。对Pru p 3,rBet v 1和rBet v 2的阳性反应分别在对桃子过敏的患者中观察到62%,7%和34%。在对桃子过敏的受试者中,对Pru p 3的敏化率显着高于对桃子不过敏的受试者(62%vs 31%,P = .02)。在对花粉过敏的受试者中,对rBet v 2的IgE反应更为频繁,但是在有或没有桃子过敏的情况下均未观察到差异。结论:Pru p 3是我们人群中桃的主要过敏原,对这种过敏原的IgE反应与桃过敏的临床表达有关。在伴有花粉过敏的那些患者中观察到对脯氨酸蛋白的致敏作用,但似乎与对桃的临床反应性无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号