...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of adhesive dentistry >Effect of previous treatments on bond strength of two self-etching adhesive systems to dental substrate.
【24h】

Effect of previous treatments on bond strength of two self-etching adhesive systems to dental substrate.

机译:先前处理对两种自蚀刻胶粘剂系统与牙科基材粘合强度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of previous dental substrate treatments on the bond strength of two self-etching adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred bovine incisors were sectioned at the cementoenamel junction. The labial tooth surface was ground to obtain flat superficial dentin. Teeth were randomly divided into two groups (n = 50): Clearfil Protect Bond and One Up Bond F. The specimens of each group were subdivided into five groups, according the dental substrate treatment, and then the adhesive system was applied as follows (n = 10): C: control, without previous treatment; TA: 37% phosphoric acid etching on enamel and dentin for 15 s; PA: 37% phosphoric acid etching only on enamel for 15 s; SB: Al2O3 sandblasting on dental surface; EDTA: enamel and dentin conditioning with 24% EDTA gel, pH 7.0. Resin composite blocks were fixed to the dental surfaces with dual-polymerized resin cement. Samples were sectioned in the mesiodistal direction and were trimmed to reduce the cross-sectional area to approximately 1.2 mm2. They were tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min on a testing machine. Microtensile bond strength values from enamel, superficial dentin, and deep dentin were compared. Mean microtensile bond strength values were expressed in MPa and were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (2 x 3 x 5) and Tukey's tests. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed for interaction (p = 0.00001) among the factors. The highest mean bond strength to enamel was found with previous phosphoric acid etching, and to dentin when EDTA was previously applied. CONCLUSION: The most indicated previous treatment for increasing the bond strength to enamel and dentin simultaneously is EDTA for both self-etching adhesive systems used.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估以前的牙科基材治疗对两种自蚀刻胶粘剂粘合强度的有效性。材料与方法:在牙釉质交界处切开一百只牛切牙。将唇齿表面研磨以获得平坦的浅表牙本质。牙齿被随机分为两组(n = 50):Clearfil Protect Bond和One Up BondF。每组的标本根据牙科基材的处理分为五组,然后按以下方式应用粘合剂系统(n = 10):C:对照,未经治疗; TA:在牙釉质和牙本质上用37%磷酸蚀刻15 s; PA:37%磷酸仅在瓷釉上蚀刻15 s; SB:在牙齿表面喷砂Al2O3; EDTA:用pH 7.0的24%EDTA凝胶调理牙釉质和牙本质。用双聚合树脂胶粘剂将树脂复合块固定到牙齿表面。将样品沿近中膜方向切开并修整以将横截面面积减小至约1.2 mm2。它们在测试机上以0.5 mm / min的十字头速度进行了测试。比较了牙釉质,表面牙本质和深牙本质的微拉伸强度值。平均微拉伸粘合强度值以MPa表示,并通过双向ANOVA(2 x 3 x 5)和Tukey检验进行分析。结果:各因素之间的交互作用存在显着差异(p = 0.00001)。在先前的磷酸蚀刻中,发现牙釉质和牙本质的平均粘合强度最高。结论:对于同时使用的自蚀刻胶粘剂体系,最能说明同时提高牙釉质和牙本质粘合强度的治疗方法是EDTA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号