首页> 外文期刊>The journal of adhesive dentistry >Influence of light-curing units on dentin bond strength after bleaching.
【24h】

Influence of light-curing units on dentin bond strength after bleaching.

机译:光固化单元对漂白后牙本质粘合强度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the influence of three different light curing units (QTH Hilux, LED SmartLite, PAC Plasmaster) on shear bond strength of an adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond ) after bleaching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty molars were used for this study. Carbamide peroxide was applied to the floor and wall of the dentin surfaces in bleached groups for 3 weeks. Each week the paste was renewed for the bleached group. Teeth were sectioned mesiodistally. The roots of the sectioned teeth were mounted in a cylindrical mold using chemically cured acrylic resin. Composite resin was added to the center of flattened dentin surfaces with an internal diameter of 3 mm and height of 3 mm. The bonding procedure was performed in the bleached test groups as follows: G1: immediately/QTH; G2: after 1 week/QTH; G3: after 2 weeks/QTH; G4: immediately/LED; G5: after 1 week/LED; G6: after 2 weeks/LED; G7: immediately/PAC; G8: after 1 week/PAC; G9: after 2 weeks/PAC. The non-bleached groups (control group) were G10: QTH; G11: LED; G12: PAC. Specimens were mounted in a universal testing machine and shear load was applied at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. Bond strength values were calculated as MPa and the comparisons were made statistically using one-way ANOVA with light source and bleaching treatment) as the two factors. RESULTS: The mean values of shear bond strength in MPa were: G1 (12.23), G2 (19.18), G3 (23.08), G4 (13.07), G5 (21.01), G6 (25.27), G7 (12.55), G8 (19.06), G9 (25.41), G10 (24.54), G11 (26.99), G12 (25.97). No statistical difference was found between the control group and groups bonded two weeks later. The bond strength values of the control group and those bonded 2 weeks later were higher than other groups. Statistically significant differences were found between the immediate and 1-week groups (p < 0.01). Immediately bonded groups had the lowest bond strength compared to the others (p < 0.05). No significant differences in bond strength were observed among three lightcuring units (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that different light-curing units had no effect on shear bond strength of bleached dentin. A 2-week delay in restoration after bleaching improved the reduced bond strength of resin composite.
机译:目的:这项体外研究的目的是比较评估三种不同的光固化单元(QTH Hilux,LED SmartLite,PAC Plasmaster)对漂白后胶粘体系(Clearfil SE Bond)的剪切粘合强度的影响。材料与方法:60颗磨牙被用于这项研究。在漂白组中将过氧化脲涂在漂白组的牙本质表面和墙壁上3周。每周将糊剂更换为漂白组。牙齿被近中切开。使用化学固化的丙烯酸树脂将切成薄片的牙齿的根部安装在圆柱形模具中。将复合树脂添加到扁平牙本质表面的中心,其内径为3 mm,高度为3 mm。在漂白测试组中进行粘合步骤如下:G1:立即/ QTH; G2:1周/ QTH之后; G3:2周/ QTH之后; G4:立即/ LED; G5:1周后/ LED; G6:2周后/ LED; G7:立即/ PAC; G8:PAC / PAC后1周; G9:每次2周/ PAC之后。未漂白组(对照组)为G10:QTH; G11:LED; G12:PAC。将样品安装在通用试验机上,以1 mm / min的十字头速度施加剪切载荷直至失效。结合强度值以MPa计算,并使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)和光源和漂白处理作为两个因素进行统计学比较。结果:以MPa为单位的剪切粘结强度平均值分别为:G1(12.23),G2(19.18),G3(23.08),G4(13.07),G5(21.01),G6(25.27),G7(12.55),G8( 19.06),G9(25.41),G10(24.54),G11(26.99),G12(25.97)。对照组和两周后结合的组之间没有发现统计学差异。对照组和2周后的结合强度均高于其他组。即时组和1周组之间差异有统计学意义(p <0.01)。立即键合的基团与其他基团相比具有最低的键合强度(p <0.05)。在三个光固化单元之间未观察到粘结强度的显着差异(p> 0.05)。结论:得出结论,不同的光固化单元对漂白牙本质的剪切粘合强度没有影响。漂白后恢复两周的延迟改善了树脂复合材料降低的粘结强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号