首页> 外文期刊>The journal of adhesive dentistry >Time to abandon traditional bond strength testing?
【24h】

Time to abandon traditional bond strength testing?

机译:是时候放弃传统的粘结强度测试了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In A. J. Kinlock's classic book "Adhesion and Adhe-sives - Science and Technology" published in 1987 by Chapman and Hall, adhesion is referred to as attraction between substrates. In Kinlock's book it also becomes evident that the level of adhesion forces operating across an interface cannot usually be measured by mechanical tests. Despite such a strong statement by a world leader in adhesion science, a large number of papers presented at scientific meetings and submitted to dental journals deal with different bond strength values. These papers tend to give the reader the impression that the property "bond strength" is an inherent material property. However, a closer look at the majority of these papers reveals that the measured strengths have standard deviation values often 25% and more of their mean strength values. If the strength values were true inherent values, such a large variability would not exist. Thus, the notion that bond strength values are inherent material properties is simply incorrect.
机译:查普曼和霍尔在1987年出版的A. J. Kinlock的经典著作“粘附力和粘合剂-科学与技术”中,粘附力被称为基材之间的吸引力。在Kinlock的书中,很明显的是,通常无法通过机械测试来测量跨界面作用的粘附力水平。尽管全球粘合科学领域的领导者发表了如此有力的声明,但是在科学会议上发表并提交给牙科期刊的大量论文却处理了不同的粘合强度值。这些论文倾向于给读者一种印象,即“粘合强度”是一种固有的材料特性。但是,仔细研究这些论文中的大多数,发现测得的强度通常具有25%甚至更多的平均强度值的标准偏差值。如果强度值是真实的固有值,那么将不会存在如此大的可变性。因此,粘结强度值是固有的材料特性的观念是完全错误的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号