首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of human resource management >Convergence towards an NPM programme or different models? Public service employment relations in Italy and France
【24h】

Convergence towards an NPM programme or different models? Public service employment relations in Italy and France

机译:趋向于NPM计划或其他模型?意大利和法国的公共服务就业关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article analyses the transformations of public service employment relations in Italy and France over the last decades, within the context of a wider administrative reform and in the light of the new public management (NPM) approach. It shows that despite a common administrative tradition, the reform trajectories in the two countries have started to diverge in the early 1980s, and even more since the 1990s. Italy adopted more closely the NPM precepts, especially in the 1997-2007 period, and some of the regulatory difficulties it has experienced are probably connected with the theoretical weaknesses of these precepts. France has been more cautious in moving in this direction, preserving several features typical of its administrative tradition to begin with the special employment status of its public employees, a model which has been labelled as neo-Weberian. In comparative perspective, the article confirms the opportunity to analyse different national reform trajectories, rooted into countryspecific legal and institutional traditions, rather than hypothesise universal processes of convergence towards the sole regulatory model represented by the NPM.
机译:本文在更广泛的行政改革背景下,并根据新的公共管理(NPM)方法,分析了过去几十年意大利和法国公共服务就业关系的转变。它表明,尽管有着共同的行政传统,但两国的改革轨迹在1980年代初开始出现分歧,自1990年代以来甚至更大。意大利尤其在1997年至2007年期间更严格地采用了NPM戒律,其所遇到的一些监管困难可能与这些戒律的理论缺陷有关。法国在朝这个方向前进时更加谨慎,保留了其行政传统的一些特征,从其公职人员的特殊就业身份开始,这种模式被称为新韦伯主义。从比较的角度来看,本文确认了有机会分析植根于特定国家的法律和制度传统的不同国家改革轨迹,而不是假设普遍趋向于以国家预防机制为代表的唯一监管模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号