首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of drug policy >Reconciling incongruous qualitative and quantitative findings in mixed methods research: Exemplars from research with drug using populations
【24h】

Reconciling incongruous qualitative and quantitative findings in mixed methods research: Exemplars from research with drug using populations

机译:调和混合方法研究中不协调的定性和定量结果:来自使用药物的人群的研究示例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mixed methods research is increasingly being promoted in the health sciences as a way to gain more comprehensive understandings of how social processes and individual behaviours shape human health. Mixed methods research most commonly combines qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis strategies. Often, integrating findings from multiple methods is assumed to confirm or validate the findings from one method with the findings from another, seeking convergence or agreement between methods. Cases in which findings from different methods are congruous are generally thought of as ideal, whilst conflicting findings may, at first glance, appear problematic. However, the latter situation provides the opportunity for a process through which apparently discordant results are reconciled, potentially leading to new emergent understandings of complex social phenomena. This paper presents three case studies drawn from the authors' research on HIV risk amongst injection drug users in which mixed methods studies yielded apparently discrepant results. We use these case studies (involving injection drug users [IDUs] using a Needle/Syringe Exchange Program in Los Angeles, CA, USA; IDUs seeking to purchase needle/syringes at pharmacies in Tijuana, Mexico; and young street-based IDUs in San Francisco, CA, USA) to identify challenges associated with integrating findings from mixed methods projects, summarize lessons learned, and make recommendations for how to more successfully anticipate and manage the integration of findings. Despite the challenges inherent in reconciling apparently conflicting findings from qualitative and quantitative approaches, in keeping with others who have argued in favour of integrating mixed methods findings, we contend that such an undertaking has the potential to yield benefits that emerge only through the struggle to reconcile discrepant results and may provide a sum that is greater than the individual qualitative and quantitative parts.
机译:在健康科学中,混合方法研究正日益得到推广,以使人们对社会过程和个人行为如何塑造人类健康有更全面的了解。混合方法研究通常将定性和定量数据收集与分析策略结合在一起。通常,将来自多种方法的结果整合在一起是为了确认或验证一种方法的结果与另一种方法的结果,以寻求方法之间的趋同或一致。通常认为来自不同方法的发现是一致的情况是理想的,而乍看起来矛盾的发现可能会出现问题。但是,后一种情况提供了一个机会,可以通过这个过程来调和表面上不一致的结果,从而有可能导致人们对复杂的社会现象有了新的认识。本文介绍了三个案例研究,这些案例研究是从作者对注射吸毒者中HIV风险的研究中得出的,在这些案例中,混合方法研究得出的结果明显不同。我们使用这些案例研究(使用美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的针头/针头交换计划让注射吸毒者[IDU]参与;寻求在墨西哥Tijuana的药房购买针头/注射器的IDU;以及位于圣胡安的年轻街头吸毒者美国加利福尼亚州的弗朗西斯科),以找出与整合混合方法项目的调查结果相关的挑战,总结经验教训,并就如何更成功地预测和管理调查结果的整合提出建议。尽管在调和定性和定量方法之间明显矛盾的结果时存在固有的挑战,但与其他主张整合混合方法结果的论点保持一致,我们认为,这种工作有可能产生只有通过和解才能产生的收益。结果不一致,并且可能提供的总和要大于单独的定性和定量部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号