首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of human resource management >Special Number in Volume 22, 2011`Alternative Dispute Resolution, Practices, Trends and Effects
【24h】

Special Number in Volume 22, 2011`Alternative Dispute Resolution, Practices, Trends and Effects

机译:2011年第22卷中的特殊编号“替代性争议解决,实践,趋势和影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A series of trends in the international environment, including globalization, expandingemployment legislation, the advent of HRM and high performance work organization,public-sector restructuring, partnership in the workplace and a shift away from adversarialindustrial relations, appear to be leading to significant levels of innovation in themanagement by firms of conflict involving individuals and groups, especially in Anglo-Saxon nations. The label that has become commonplace to describe these innovations is`alternative dispute resolution' (ADR): a term originally applied to such developments inindividual dispute resolution as mediation, ombudspersons, review panels, etc., but that isnow also applied to innovations in group and collective conflict management such asinterest-based bargaining, fact-finding, assisted negotiations and various forms ofmediation. No international symposium in a leading scholarly journal has soughtsystematically to examine these developments and to assess their effects. The objective ofthe special number of IJHRM is to address this gap in the literature by presenting the workof scholars in this area to the global HR community.
机译:国际环境中的一系列趋势,包括全球化,扩大的就业立法,人力资源管理和高绩效工作组织的出现,公共部门的结构调整,工作场所的伙伴关系以及与对抗性劳资关系的转变,似乎导致了很大程度的发展。涉及个人和团体的冲突公司在管理管理方面的创新,特别是在盎格鲁撒克逊国家。描述这些创新的标签很普遍,是“替代性争议解决”(ADR):最初用于解决个体争议解决的发展,例如调解,监察员,审查小组等,但现在也应用于组内创新集体冲突管理,例如基于利益的讨价还价,事实调查,协助谈判和各种形式的调解。在领先的学术期刊中,没有任何国际专题讨论会系统地研究这些发展并评估其影响。 IJHRM特殊号的目的是通过向全球HR界介绍这一领域的学者著作来填补文献中的这一空白。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号