...
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of urology >The UroCuff test: a non-invasive alternative to pressure flow studies in adult males with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to bladder outlet obstruction
【24h】

The UroCuff test: a non-invasive alternative to pressure flow studies in adult males with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to bladder outlet obstruction

机译:UroCuff测试:对继发于膀胱出口阻塞的下尿路症状的成年男性进行压力流研究的一种非侵入性替代方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: To assure that patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) benefit from interventions, urologists must practice careful selection of surgical candidates. Currently, 15%-30% of men do not benefit optimally from these invasive and potentially morbid procedures. Success rates following transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are higher if bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) is confirmed prior to the procedure by invasive pressure flow studies (PFS). However, PFS may not be performed because of many reasons. We report a study of a non-invasive method of assessing BOO.
机译:简介:为了确保具有下尿路症状(LUTS)的患者可从干预措施中受益,泌尿科医师必须谨慎选择手术对象。目前,有15%-30%的男性无法从这些侵入性和潜在病态手术中获得最佳收益。如果在术前通过有创压力流研究(PFS)确定了膀胱出口梗阻(BOO),则经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)的成功率会更高。但是,由于许多原因,可能无法执行PFS。我们报告了一项评估BOO的非侵入性方法的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号