...
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Nutrition >Body fat and fat-free mass measured by bioelectric impedance spectroscopy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in obese and non-obese adults
【24h】

Body fat and fat-free mass measured by bioelectric impedance spectroscopy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in obese and non-obese adults

机译:通过生物电阻抗光谱法和双能X射线吸收法测定肥胖和非肥胖成年人的体内脂肪和无脂肪质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of the present study was to compare body fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) estimates by bioelectric impedance spectroscopy (BIS), with respective estimates by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA),in obese and non-obese subjects. Body composition was measured in ninety-three obese and non-obese men and women by BIS device,BodyScout (Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) and DXA device, Lunar iDXA (GE Healthcare, Madison,WI, USA). Mean difference between the methods was analysed by t tests, and Bland-Altman plots were generated to further examine the differences between the methods. Mean difference between the estimates by DXA and BIS ( and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement) were as follows: FM 4-1(—2.9,11-2)kg and 4-5 (—2.9,11.8) X): FFM 4 1(11.2, 2.9) kg and —4.5 (—11.9,2.9)%,indicating large inter-individual variation and statistically significant underestimation of FM and overestimation of FFM by BIS, as compared to DXA. The underestimation of FMkg (FM measured in kg)and overestimation of FFMkg (FFM measured in kg) were more pronounced in men than in women, and the underestimation of FM% (FM measured in percent) and overestimation of FFM% (FFM measured in percent) were more pronounced in normal weight (BMI = 20.0-24.9 kg/m~2) than in overweight and obese (BMI —25.0 kg/m~2) subjects. BIS may be suitable for classification of a population into groups according to FM and FFM. However, the large inter-individual variation suggests that this BIS device with the proprietary software is insufficient for estimation of single individual body FM and FFM,
机译:本研究的目的是比较通过生物电阻抗光谱法(BIS)估算的肥胖者和肥胖者的体内脂肪质量(FM)和无脂肪质量(FFM)以及通过双能X线吸收法(DXA)得出的各自估算值非肥胖受试者。通过BIS设备BodyScout(德国巴特洪堡的Fresenius Kabi)和DXA设备Lunar iDXA(美国威斯康星州麦迪逊,GE Healthcare)测量了93名肥胖和非肥胖男性和女性的身体成分。通过t检验分析了方法之间的平均差异,并生成了Bland-Altman图以进一步检验方法之间的差异。 DXA和BIS(和Bland-Altman协议的95%限制)估计值之间的平均差如下:FM 4-1(-2.9,11-2)kg和4-5(-2.9,11.8)X): FFM 4 1(11.2,2.9)kg和—4.5(-11.9,2.9)%,表明个体间差异较大,与DXA相比,BIS对FM的统计显着低估和FFM的高估。男性比女性更明显地低估FMkg(以千克为单位的FM)和FFMkg(以千克为单位的FFM),而FM%的低估(FM的百分比)和FFM%的高估(FFM的百分比)。体重(BMI = 20.0-24.9 kg / m〜2)的人比超重和肥胖(BMI -25.0 kg / m〜2)的人更明显。 BIS可能适合根据FM和FFM将人群分类。但是,个体之间的差异很大,这表明带有专有软件的BIS设备不足以估算单个人体的FM和FFM,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号